MDYG vs. SLYV
MDYG (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF) and SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MDYG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDYG returned 11.74%/yr vs 10.65%/yr for SLYV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
MDYG vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MDYG having a 18.87% return and SLYV slightly higher at 19.47%. Over the past 10 years, MDYG has outperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 11.74%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.65% annualized return.
MDYG
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 18.87%
- 6M
- 17.59%
- 1Y
- 31.67%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
SLYV
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 19.47%
- 6M
- 16.63%
- 1Y
- 41.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
MDYG vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 18.87% | 7.22% | 15.84% | 17.30% | -18.92% | 18.46% | 22.57% | 26.10% | -10.46% | 19.61% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 19.47% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDYG and SLYV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005 | 0.85 |
The correlation between MDYG and SLYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDYG vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDYG
SLYV
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
MDYG
SLYV
Technology
MDYG
SLYV
Healthcare
MDYG
SLYV
Consumer Cyclical
MDYG
SLYV
Financial Services
MDYG
SLYV
Real Estate
MDYG
SLYV
Basic Materials
MDYG
SLYV
Energy
MDYG
SLYV
Utilities
MDYG
SLYV
Consumer Defensive
MDYG
SLYV
Communication Services
MDYG
SLYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDYG vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank
MDYG
SLYV
MDYG vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDYG | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.37 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 4.20 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.86 | 13.96 | -2.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDYG vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDYG drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, roughly equal to the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYG and SLYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDYG | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.44% | -61.15% | +2.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.91% | -9.36% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.45% | -28.68% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.26% | -28.68% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.27% | -47.73% | +8.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | 0.00% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -8.93% | +0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 2.82% | -0.33% |
Volatility
MDYG vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) at 4.81%. This indicates that MDYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDYG | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.17% | 4.81% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.87% | 11.59% | +2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.59% | 18.31% | -0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 21.97% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.09% | 23.96% | -2.87% |
MDYG vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MDYG and SLYV have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MDYG vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison
MDYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than SLYV's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.61% | 0.75% | 0.87% | 1.20% | 1.16% | 0.69% | 0.71% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 2.23% | 1.25% | 2.51% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.75% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDYG and SLYV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDYG has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to SLYV (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYG dropped -58.44% vs SLYV's -61.15%.
On 10-year performance, MDYG leads with 11.74% vs 10.65% for SLYV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MDYG has performed better with a 11.74% return vs 10.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MDYG and SLYV have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.61% for MDYG.
MDYG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. MDYG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDYG and SLYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer