PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDYG vs. SLYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDYG vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MDYG having a 18.87% return and SLYV slightly higher at 19.47%. Over the past 10 years, MDYG has outperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 11.74%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.65% annualized return.


MDYG

1D
0.58%
1M
2.26%
YTD
18.87%
6M
17.59%
1Y
31.67%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*
11.74%

SLYV

1D
1.09%
1M
6.39%
YTD
19.47%
6M
16.63%
1Y
41.92%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
10.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDYG vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDYG
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
18.87%7.22%15.84%17.30%-18.92%18.46%22.57%26.10%-10.46%19.61%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
19.47%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between MDYG and SLYV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005

0.85

The correlation between MDYG and SLYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

MDYG vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDYG
SLYV

Industrials

30.2%
11.6%

Technology

24.8%
13.4%

Healthcare

13.7%
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
15.4%

Financial Services

6.7%
19.5%

Real Estate

5.3%
8.6%

Basic Materials

3.5%
6.9%

Energy

3.2%
7.0%

Utilities

2.0%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
3.8%

Communication Services

1.4%
4.4%

Industrials

MDYG
30.2%
SLYV
11.6%

Technology

MDYG
24.8%
SLYV
13.4%

Healthcare

MDYG
13.7%
SLYV
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MDYG
7.5%
SLYV
15.4%

Financial Services

MDYG
6.7%
SLYV
19.5%

Real Estate

MDYG
5.3%
SLYV
8.6%

Basic Materials

MDYG
3.5%
SLYV
6.9%

Energy

MDYG
3.2%
SLYV
7.0%

Utilities

MDYG
2.0%
SLYV
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

MDYG
1.8%
SLYV
3.8%

Communication Services

MDYG
1.4%
SLYV
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDYG vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDYG
MDYG Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MDYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MDYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDYG vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDYGSLYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

4.20

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.86

13.96

-2.10

MDYG vs. SLYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the SLYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDYG and SLYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDYG vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDYG drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, roughly equal to the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYG and SLYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDYGSLYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.44%

-61.15%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.91%

-9.36%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.45%

-28.68%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.26%

-28.68%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.27%

-47.73%

+8.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

0.00%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-8.93%

+0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.82%

-0.33%

Volatility

MDYG vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) at 4.81%. This indicates that MDYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDYGSLYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.17%

4.81%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.87%

11.59%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.59%

18.31%

-0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.70%

21.97%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.09%

23.96%

-2.87%

MDYG vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MDYG and SLYV have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MDYG vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison

MDYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than SLYV's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDYG
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
0.61%0.75%0.87%1.20%1.16%0.69%0.71%1.21%1.36%2.23%1.25%2.51%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.75%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDYG and SLYV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDYG has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to SLYV (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYG dropped -58.44% vs SLYV's -61.15%.

On 10-year performance, MDYG leads with 11.74% vs 10.65% for SLYV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MDYG has performed better with a 11.74% return vs 10.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MDYG and SLYV have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.61% for MDYG.

MDYG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. MDYG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDYG and SLYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer