MDY vs. VFMO
MDY (SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF) and VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MDY is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VFMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Vanguard. MDY is passively managed, while VFMO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MDY returned 8.21%/yr vs 14.02%/yr for VFMO. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDY charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMO.
Performance
MDY vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 14.41% return, which is significantly lower than VFMO's 25.84% return.
MDY
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 14.41%
- 6M
- 12.36%
- 1Y
- 24.68%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
VFMO
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 25.84%
- 6M
- 22.71%
- 1Y
- 44.30%
- 3Y*
- 27.88%
- 5Y*
- 14.02%
- 10Y*
- —
MDY vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 14.41% | 7.19% | 13.64% | 16.07% | -13.28% | 24.53% | 13.50% | 25.78% | -10.24% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 25.84% | 17.39% | 26.14% | 16.25% | -12.84% | 19.16% | 31.36% | 28.22% | -11.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDY and VFMO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018 | 0.85 |
The correlation between MDY and VFMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDY vs. VFMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDY
VFMO
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MDY
VFMO
Technology
MDY
VFMO
Financial Services
MDY
VFMO
Consumer Cyclical
MDY
VFMO
Healthcare
MDY
VFMO
Real Estate
MDY
VFMO
Energy
MDY
VFMO
Basic Materials
MDY
VFMO
Consumer Defensive
MDY
VFMO
Utilities
MDY
VFMO
Communication Services
MDY
VFMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDY vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank
MDY
VFMO
MDY vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDY | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.34 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 4.05 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.23 | 15.07 | -4.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDY vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, which is greater than VFMO's maximum drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and VFMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDY | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.33% | -36.77% | -18.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -10.98% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.03% | -24.40% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | -25.80% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -2.31% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -7.73% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.95% | -0.53% |
Volatility
MDY vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) is 4.69%, while Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that MDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDY | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | 8.33% | -3.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.70% | 17.49% | -5.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.81% | 22.34% | -6.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 21.90% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.18% | 23.64% | -2.46% |
MDY vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MDY vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison
MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than VFMO's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.02% | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.39% | 0.82% | 0.72% | 0.89% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 1.22% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDY and VFMO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFMO has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to MDY (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDY dropped -55.33% vs VFMO's -36.77%.
On 5-year performance, VFMO leads with 14.02% vs 8.21% for MDY. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, MDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 14.02% return vs 8.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MDY.
MDY has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.39% for VFMO.
MDY is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VFMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.13% for VFMO.
VFMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDY and VFMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer