PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFMO vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFMO vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMO achieves a 23.55% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.69% return.


VFMO

1D
1.51%
1M
5.48%
YTD
23.55%
6M
24.95%
1Y
44.08%
3Y*
27.89%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMO vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFMO
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
23.55%17.39%26.14%16.25%-12.84%19.16%31.36%28.22%-11.41%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMO and VOO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.84

The correlation between VFMO and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFMO vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFMO
VOO

Industrials

24.7%
8.3%

Healthcare

22.9%
8.5%

Technology

17.5%
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
10.2%

Energy

7.3%
3.5%

Financial Services

6.5%
11.6%

Basic Materials

6.4%
1.8%

Communication Services

3.4%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
4.9%

Utilities

0.2%
2.4%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.9%

Industrials

VFMO
24.7%
VOO
8.3%

Healthcare

VFMO
22.9%
VOO
8.5%

Technology

VFMO
17.5%
VOO
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VFMO
8.7%
VOO
10.2%

Energy

VFMO
7.3%
VOO
3.5%

Financial Services

VFMO
6.5%
VOO
11.6%

Basic Materials

VFMO
6.4%
VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

VFMO
3.4%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

VFMO
2.5%
VOO
4.9%

Utilities

VFMO
0.2%
VOO
2.4%

Real Estate

VFMO
0.1%
VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFMO vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMO
VFMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VFMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMO vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFMOVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.09

2.53

-0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.74

3.43

-0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.46

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

3.42

+0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.40

15.95

-0.55

VFMO vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMO and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFMOVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.53

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.85

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.89

-0.23

Drawdowns

VFMO vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMO drawdown since its inception was -36.77%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMO and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFMOVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.77%

-33.99%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.98%

-8.90%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

-18.69%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.80%

-24.52%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.77%

-3.69%

-4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

1.91%

+0.99%

Volatility

VFMO vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that VFMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFMOVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

2.74%

+3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.48%

8.88%

+7.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.20%

11.78%

+9.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.70%

16.81%

+4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.57%

18.01%

+5.56%

VFMO vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFMO vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VFMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFMO
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.63%0.82%0.72%0.89%1.72%0.81%0.45%1.22%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFMO and VOO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFMO has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMO dropped -36.77% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 14.26% vs 13.98% for VFMO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 14.26% return vs 13.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFMO.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.63% for VFMO.

VFMO is categorized as Momentum, while VOO is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFMO and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFMO and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer