MDY vs. FNX
MDY (SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF) and FNX (First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MDY is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while FNX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDY returned 11.05%/yr vs 11.92%/yr for FNX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDY charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FNX.
Performance
MDY vs. FNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 14.02% return, which is significantly higher than FNX's 12.02% return. Over the past 10 years, MDY has underperformed FNX with an annualized return of 11.05%, while FNX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.92% annualized return.
MDY
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 14.02%
- 6M
- 15.05%
- 1Y
- 26.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
FNX
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 13.02%
- 1Y
- 28.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.92%
MDY vs. FNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 14.02% | 7.19% | 13.64% | 16.07% | -13.28% | 24.53% | 13.50% | 25.78% | -11.29% | 15.93% |
FNX First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 12.02% | 9.87% | 12.21% | 20.39% | -13.57% | 25.05% | 16.04% | 26.97% | -11.23% | 17.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDY and FNX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007 | 0.94 |
The correlation between MDY and FNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDY vs. FNX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDY
FNX
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MDY
FNX
Technology
MDY
FNX
Financial Services
MDY
FNX
Consumer Cyclical
MDY
FNX
Healthcare
MDY
FNX
Real Estate
MDY
FNX
Energy
MDY
FNX
Basic Materials
MDY
FNX
Consumer Defensive
MDY
FNX
Utilities
MDY
FNX
Communication Services
MDY
FNX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDY vs. FNX — Risk / Return Rank
MDY
FNX
MDY vs. FNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDY | FNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.73 | 1.77 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 2.59 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.31 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 3.06 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.99 | 10.55 | +0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDY | FNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 1.77 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.54 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.42 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
MDY vs. FNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, roughly equal to the maximum FNX drawdown of -57.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and FNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDY | FNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.33% | -57.11% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -9.24% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.03% | -24.97% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | -24.97% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.22% | -43.95% | +1.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.59% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -8.41% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.68% | -0.26% |
Volatility
MDY vs. FNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) is 4.40%, while First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that MDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDY | FNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 4.74% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 11.45% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.48% | 16.11% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 20.50% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 21.97% | -0.78% |
MDY vs. FNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FNX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDY vs. FNX - Dividend Comparison
MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than FNX's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNX First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 0.83% | 0.88% | 1.26% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.21% | 1.01% | 0.90% | 1.07% | 1.07% |
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, MDY and FNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FNX has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to MDY (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDY dropped -55.33% vs FNX's -57.11%.
On 10-year performance, FNX leads with 11.92% vs 11.05% for MDY. On fees, MDY is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, MDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FNX has performed better with a 11.92% return vs 11.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MDY is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FNX.
MDY has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.83% for FNX.
MDY is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while FNX is Mid Cap Blend Equities. MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while FNX tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.60% for FNX.
FNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDY and FNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer