PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNX vs. VO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNX vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNX achieves a 14.46% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 11.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNX having a 12.51% annualized return and VO not far behind at 12.03%.


FNX

1D
0.48%
1M
3.65%
YTD
14.46%
6M
11.83%
1Y
29.14%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
12.51%

VO

1D
0.44%
1M
3.04%
YTD
11.30%
6M
9.77%
1Y
19.89%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNX vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
14.46%9.87%12.21%20.39%-13.57%25.05%16.04%26.97%-11.23%17.66%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
11.30%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FNX and VO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.91

The correlation between FNX and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNX vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNX
VO

Financial Services

18.7%
12.5%

Industrials

18.2%
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
8.6%

Technology

13.3%
20.8%

Healthcare

10.1%
7.5%

Real Estate

7.1%
5.1%

Energy

5.7%
7.9%

Basic Materials

3.2%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
4.7%

Utilities

2.8%
7.9%

Communication Services

2.4%
3.0%

Financial Services

FNX
18.7%
VO
12.5%

Industrials

FNX
18.2%
VO
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FNX
15.4%
VO
8.6%

Technology

FNX
13.3%
VO
20.8%

Healthcare

FNX
10.1%
VO
7.5%

Real Estate

FNX
7.1%
VO
5.1%

Energy

FNX
5.7%
VO
7.9%

Basic Materials

FNX
3.2%
VO
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

FNX
3.2%
VO
4.7%

Utilities

FNX
2.8%
VO
7.9%

Communication Services

FNX
2.4%
VO
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNX vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNX
FNX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNX vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNXVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.45

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.89

9.23

+1.66

FNX vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNX and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNX vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNX drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, roughly equal to the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNX and VO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNXVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.11%

-58.87%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-8.17%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.97%

-19.02%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.97%

-27.57%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.95%

-39.37%

-4.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.45%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-7.85%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.16%

+0.52%

Volatility

FNX vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNXVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

4.35%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

9.80%

+1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.41%

12.80%

+3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.51%

17.66%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.99%

18.98%

+3.01%

FNX vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNX vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

FNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than VO's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.81%0.88%1.26%1.11%1.19%0.94%1.04%1.21%1.01%0.90%1.07%1.07%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.35%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FNX and VO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to VO (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNX dropped -57.11% vs VO's -58.87%.

On 10-year performance, FNX leads with 12.51% vs 12.03% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNX has performed better with a 12.51% return vs 12.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FNX.

VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.81% for FNX.

FNX tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FNX and 0.03% for VO.

FNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNX and VO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer