MDY vs. EPU
MDY (SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF) and EPU (iShares MSCI Peru ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - MDY tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index while EPU tracks the MSCI All Peru Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDY returned 11.40%/yr vs 14.73%/yr for EPU. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDY charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EPU.
Performance
MDY vs. EPU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 14.41% return, which is significantly lower than EPU's 18.54% return. Over the past 10 years, MDY has underperformed EPU with an annualized return of 11.40%, while EPU has yielded a comparatively higher 14.73% annualized return.
MDY
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 14.41%
- 6M
- 12.36%
- 1Y
- 24.68%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
EPU
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- 3.83%
- YTD
- 18.54%
- 6M
- 17.84%
- 1Y
- 83.34%
- 3Y*
- 46.58%
- 5Y*
- 29.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.73%
MDY vs. EPU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 14.41% | 7.19% | 13.64% | 16.07% | -13.28% | 24.53% | 13.50% | 25.78% | -11.29% | 15.93% |
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 18.54% | 86.87% | 21.73% | 25.34% | 2.05% | -11.81% | -4.31% | 7.30% | -12.17% | 29.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDY and EPU is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2009 | 0.51 |
The correlation between MDY and EPU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDY vs. EPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDY
EPU
Industrials
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MDY
EPU
Technology
MDY
EPU
-
Financial Services
MDY
EPU
Consumer Cyclical
MDY
EPU
Healthcare
MDY
EPU
Real Estate
MDY
EPU
Energy
MDY
EPU
-
Basic Materials
MDY
EPU
Consumer Defensive
MDY
EPU
Utilities
MDY
EPU
Communication Services
MDY
EPU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDY vs. EPU — Risk / Return Rank
MDY
EPU
MDY vs. EPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDY | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.42 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 4.02 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.23 | 11.51 | -1.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDY vs. EPU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum EPU drawdown of -60.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and EPU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDY | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.33% | -60.62% | +5.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -20.85% | +12.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.03% | -20.85% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | -35.59% | +11.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.22% | -50.97% | +8.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -8.61% | +7.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -18.79% | +11.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 7.27% | -4.85% |
Volatility
MDY vs. EPU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) is 4.69%, while iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a volatility of 12.75%. This indicates that MDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDY | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | 12.75% | -8.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.70% | 27.23% | -15.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.81% | 31.33% | -15.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 25.12% | -5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.18% | 23.66% | -2.48% |
MDY vs. EPU - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than EPU's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDY vs. EPU - Dividend Comparison
MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than EPU's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 2.02% | 1.63% | 5.78% | 4.17% | 5.56% | 3.13% | 1.91% | 2.67% | 1.53% | 3.30% | 0.85% | 1.90% |
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.02% | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDY and EPU have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPU has higher volatility (12.75%) compared to MDY (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDY dropped -55.33% vs EPU's -60.62%.
On 10-year performance, EPU leads with 14.73% vs 11.40% for MDY. On fees, MDY is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, MDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EPU has performed better with a 14.73% return vs 11.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MDY is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EPU.
EPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 1.02% for MDY.
MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.59% for EPU.
EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDY and EPU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer