PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDY vs. BBMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDY vs. BBMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 14.02% return, which is significantly lower than BBMC's 16.80% return.


MDY

1D
0.90%
1M
3.28%
YTD
14.02%
6M
15.05%
1Y
26.67%
3Y*
15.81%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
11.05%

BBMC

1D
0.84%
1M
4.69%
YTD
16.80%
6M
17.86%
1Y
34.79%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDY vs. BBMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
14.02%7.19%13.64%16.07%-13.28%24.53%54.42%
BBMC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
16.80%12.24%15.15%18.37%-19.77%17.64%61.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MDY and BBMC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020

0.97

The correlation between MDY and BBMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

MDY vs. BBMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDY
BBMC

Industrials

25.1%
18.6%

Technology

15.4%
21.6%

Financial Services

13.9%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
11.5%

Healthcare

8.7%
10.0%

Real Estate

7.7%
6.3%

Energy

5.6%
3.1%

Basic Materials

4.8%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
3.5%

Utilities

3.1%
2.6%

Communication Services

1.0%
2.4%

Industrials

MDY
25.1%
BBMC
18.6%

Technology

MDY
15.4%
BBMC
21.6%

Financial Services

MDY
13.9%
BBMC
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MDY
10.8%
BBMC
11.5%

Healthcare

MDY
8.7%
BBMC
10.0%

Real Estate

MDY
7.7%
BBMC
6.3%

Energy

MDY
5.6%
BBMC
3.1%

Basic Materials

MDY
4.8%
BBMC
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

MDY
3.8%
BBMC
3.5%

Utilities

MDY
3.1%
BBMC
2.6%

Communication Services

MDY
1.0%
BBMC
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDY vs. BBMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDY
MDY Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDY Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDY Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

BBMC
BBMC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BBMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBMC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BBMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBMC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDY vs. BBMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDYBBMCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

2.14

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

2.98

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

3.58

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.99

14.12

-3.12

MDY vs. BBMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the BBMC Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDY and BBMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDYBBMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.14

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.41

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.85

-0.32

Drawdowns

MDY vs. BBMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, which is greater than BBMC's maximum drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and BBMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDYBBMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.33%

-30.11%

-25.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-9.75%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.03%

-24.18%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.03%

-30.11%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-8.93%

+1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.47%

-0.05%

Volatility

MDY vs. BBMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) is 4.40%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that MDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDYBBMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

4.75%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

12.15%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.48%

16.32%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.77%

20.59%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.19%

21.08%

+0.11%

MDY vs. BBMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than BBMC's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MDY vs. BBMC - Dividend Comparison

MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than BBMC's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBMC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.09%1.25%1.31%1.36%1.48%0.87%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
1.04%1.15%1.18%1.21%1.37%0.96%1.12%1.34%1.39%1.18%1.31%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, MDY and BBMC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBMC has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to MDY (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDY dropped -55.33% vs BBMC's -30.11%.

On 5-year performance, BBMC leads with 8.50% vs 8.07% for MDY. On fees, BBMC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, MDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBMC has performed better with a 8.50% return vs 8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBMC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MDY.

BBMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 1.04% for MDY.

MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while BBMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.07% for BBMC.

BBMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDY and BBMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer