MDLZ vs. VOO
MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, MDLZ returned 6.09%/yr vs 15.50%/yr for VOO. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MDLZ vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDLZ achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.08% return. Over the past 10 years, MDLZ has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 6.09%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.50% annualized return.
MDLZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- 1Y
- -2.75%
- 3Y*
- -1.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 25.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
MDLZ vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 18.03% | -7.03% | -15.30% | 11.17% | 2.92% | 15.87% | 8.58% | 40.42% | -4.27% | -1.58% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDLZ and VOO is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.46 |
The correlation between MDLZ and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDLZ vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
MDLZ
VOO
MDLZ vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDLZ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.36 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 2.75 | -2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | 12.42 | -12.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDLZ vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDLZ drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLZ and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDLZ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.52% | -33.99% | -8.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.93% | -8.90% | -17.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.00% | -18.69% | -10.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -24.52% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.74% | -33.99% | +4.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.59% | -2.34% | -10.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.03% | -3.68% | -7.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.70% | 1.97% | +12.73% |
Volatility
MDLZ vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.34%. This indicates that MDLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDLZ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 4.34% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.28% | 9.58% | +6.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.26% | 12.27% | +9.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.52% | 16.88% | +2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 18.03% | +3.00% |
Dividends
MDLZ vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 3.13% | 3.60% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 2.01% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.62% | 1.43% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDLZ and VOO have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDLZ has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLZ dropped -42.52% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDLZ and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer