MDLZ vs. UNG
MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.) is a stock, while UNG (United States Natural Gas Fund LP) is Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Natural Gas. Over the past 10 years, MDLZ returned 6.09%/yr vs -21.38%/yr for UNG. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MDLZ vs. UNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDLZ achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly higher than UNG's -7.42% return. Over the past 10 years, MDLZ has outperformed UNG with an annualized return of 6.09%, while UNG has yielded a comparatively lower -21.38% annualized return.
MDLZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- 1Y
- -2.75%
- 3Y*
- -1.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
UNG
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- -7.42%
- 6M
- -10.84%
- 1Y
- -30.62%
- 3Y*
- -23.83%
- 5Y*
- -24.47%
- 10Y*
- -21.38%
MDLZ vs. UNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 18.03% | -7.03% | -15.30% | 11.17% | 2.92% | 15.87% | 8.58% | 40.42% | -4.27% | -1.58% |
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | -7.42% | -27.07% | -17.11% | -64.04% | 12.89% | 35.76% | -45.43% | -31.77% | 5.96% | -37.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDLZ and UNG is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2007 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDLZ vs. UNG — Risk / Return Rank
MDLZ
UNG
MDLZ vs. UNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDLZ | UNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.95 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | -0.67 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | -0.97 | +0.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDLZ vs. UNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDLZ drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, smaller than the maximum UNG drawdown of -99.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLZ and UNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDLZ | UNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.52% | -99.88% | +57.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.93% | -43.86% | +17.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.00% | -68.16% | +39.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -92.49% | +63.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.74% | -93.55% | +63.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.59% | -99.86% | +87.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.03% | -89.96% | +78.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.70% | 30.28% | -15.58% |
Volatility
MDLZ vs. UNG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) is 5.46%, while United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) has a volatility of 12.64%. This indicates that MDLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDLZ | UNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 12.64% | -7.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.28% | 52.01% | -35.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.26% | 60.61% | -38.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.52% | 64.11% | -44.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 54.77% | -33.74% |
Dividends
MDLZ vs. UNG - Dividend Comparison
MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, while UNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 3.13% | 3.60% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 2.01% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.62% | 1.43% |
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDLZ and UNG have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UNG has higher volatility (12.64%) compared to MDLZ (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLZ dropped -42.52% vs UNG's -99.88%.
MDLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDLZ and UNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer