MDLZ vs. SCHC
MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.) is a stock, while SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux). Over the past 10 years, MDLZ returned 6.09%/yr vs 8.48%/yr for SCHC. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MDLZ vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDLZ achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly higher than SCHC's 9.25% return. Over the past 10 years, MDLZ has underperformed SCHC with an annualized return of 6.09%, while SCHC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.48% annualized return.
MDLZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- 1Y
- -2.75%
- 3Y*
- -1.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
SCHC
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.48%
MDLZ vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 18.03% | -7.03% | -15.30% | 11.17% | 2.92% | 15.87% | 8.58% | 40.42% | -4.27% | -1.58% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 9.25% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 14.36% | -21.74% | 12.02% | 10.48% | 23.10% | -18.60% | 29.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDLZ and SCHC is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MDLZ and SCHC has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDLZ vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank
MDLZ
SCHC
MDLZ vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDLZ | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.27 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 1.93 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | 7.12 | -7.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDLZ vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDLZ drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHC drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLZ and SCHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDLZ | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.52% | -43.94% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.93% | -12.48% | -13.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.00% | -15.52% | -13.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -36.48% | +7.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.74% | -43.94% | +14.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.59% | -3.49% | -9.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.03% | -10.04% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.70% | 3.38% | +11.32% |
Volatility
MDLZ vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) is 5.46%, while Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that MDLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDLZ | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 6.31% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.28% | 13.88% | +2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.26% | 16.21% | +6.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.52% | 17.62% | +1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 18.02% | +3.01% |
Dividends
MDLZ vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison
MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than SCHC's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 3.13% | 3.60% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 2.01% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.62% | 1.43% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.35% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDLZ and SCHC have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHC has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to MDLZ (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLZ dropped -42.52% vs SCHC's -43.94%.
SCHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDLZ and SCHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer