PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDLV vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDLV vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDLV achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 14.21% return.


MDLV

1D
0.67%
1M
2.12%
YTD
10.95%
6M
11.88%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
10Y*

FDL

1D
0.78%
1M
0.32%
YTD
14.21%
6M
15.52%
1Y
25.50%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
11.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDLV vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MDLV
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
10.95%13.30%10.16%0.68%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
14.21%14.79%17.98%5.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MDLV and FDL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023

0.88

The correlation between MDLV and FDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

MDLV vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDLV
FDL

Utilities

15.2%
6.5%

Industrials

15.0%
3.8%

Financial Services

14.9%
15.1%

Energy

14.4%
27.3%

Technology

9.3%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.2%
14.7%

Healthcare

7.9%
16.8%

Communication Services

6.4%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
3.8%

Basic Materials

2.6%
0.3%

Real Estate

2.2%

-

Utilities

MDLV
15.2%
FDL
6.5%

Industrials

MDLV
15.0%
FDL
3.8%

Financial Services

MDLV
14.9%
FDL
15.1%

Energy

MDLV
14.4%
FDL
27.3%

Technology

MDLV
9.3%
FDL
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

MDLV
8.2%
FDL
14.7%

Healthcare

MDLV
7.9%
FDL
16.8%

Communication Services

MDLV
6.4%
FDL
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MDLV
3.9%
FDL
3.8%

Basic Materials

MDLV
2.6%
FDL
0.3%

Real Estate

MDLV
2.2%
FDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDLV vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDLV
MDLV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
MDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDLV vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDLVFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.40

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

5.99

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.75

14.59

+1.16

MDLV vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDLV and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDLVFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.27

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.45

+0.63

Drawdowns

MDLV vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDLV drawdown since its inception was -10.71%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLV and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDLVFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.71%

-65.93%

+55.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-4.27%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.71%

-12.24%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-1.41%

+0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-9.66%

+7.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

1.75%

-0.39%

Volatility

MDLV vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) have volatilities of 2.83% and 2.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDLVFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

2.95%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.58%

7.85%

-1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.77%

11.30%

-2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.51%

14.31%

-3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.51%

17.11%

-6.60%

MDLV vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDLV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDLV vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

MDLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than FDL's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.65%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
MDLV
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
2.78%3.00%2.78%2.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDLV and FDL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to MDLV (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLV dropped -10.71% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 3-year performance, FDL leads with 19.57% vs 13.07% for MDLV. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, MDLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FDL has performed better with a 19.57% return vs 13.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for MDLV.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 2.78% for MDLV.

They also come from different issuers: Morgan Dempsey and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for MDLV and 0.45% for FDL.

MDLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDLV and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer