MDLV vs. DVAL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MDLV (Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF) and DVAL (BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MDLV returned 12.71%/yr vs 12.37%/yr for DVAL. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MDLV charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for DVAL.

Performance

MDLV vs. DVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) and BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDLV achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly lower than DVAL's 13.26% return.

MDLV

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.98%
• 6M: 6.14%
• YTD: 12.51%
• 1Y: 20.08%
• 3Y*: 12.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.92%

DVAL

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 2.88%
• 6M: 8.79%
• YTD: 13.26%
• 1Y: 18.55%
• 3Y*: 12.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DVAL BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	$286.13K	$154.34K	$233.85K
MDLV Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF	$182.53K	$187.37K	$196.78K

MDLV vs. DVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MDLV Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF	12.51%	13.30%	10.16%	-0.14%
DVAL BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	13.26%	8.74%	12.84%	8.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MDLV and DVAL is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2023	0.79

The correlation between MDLV and DVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

MDLV vs. DVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MDLV	DVAL
Financial Services	15.4%	32.9%
Utilities	15.3%	0.3%
Industrials	15.1%	14.1%
Energy	13.6%	5.5%
Technology	9.6%	14.0%
Healthcare	8.6%	9.4%
Consumer Defensive	8.3%	4.3%
Communication Services	5.5%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	4.4%	10.1%
Basic Materials	2.4%	0.1%
Real Estate	1.9%	-

Return for Risk

MDLV vs. DVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MDLV

MDLV Risk / Return Rank: 89
MDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
MDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 84
MDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
MDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 90

DVAL

DVAL Risk / Return Rank: 73
DVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
DVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
DVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MDLV vs. DVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) and BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MDLV	DVAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	1.63	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	2.41	+0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.28	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.57	2.79	+1.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.36	9.36	+5.01

MDLV vs. DVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the DVAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDLV and DVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MDLV vs. DVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDLV drawdown since its inception was -10.71%, smaller than the maximum DVAL drawdown of -18.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLV and DVAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDLV	DVAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.71%	-18.11%	+7.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.27%	-6.20%	+1.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.71%	-18.11%	+7.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.20%	-0.80%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.23%	-3.50%	+1.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.35%	1.84%	-0.49%

Volatility

MDLV vs. DVAL - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) at 3.03%. This indicates that MDLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MDLV	DVAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.39%	3.03%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.97%	7.73%	-0.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.17%	10.61%	-1.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.52%	14.11%	-3.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.52%	14.11%	-3.59%

MDLV vs. DVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDLV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than DVAL's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

MDLV vs. DVAL - Dividend Comparison

MDLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than DVAL's 1.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DVAL BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	1.77%	2.00%	2.82%	1.16%	13.13%
MDLV Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF	2.70%	3.00%	2.78%	2.35%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDLV and DVAL in my portfolio?

MDLV and DVAL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MDLV or DVAL?

MDLV has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to DVAL (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLV dropped -10.71% vs DVAL's -18.11%.

Which ETF is better, MDLV or DVAL?

On 3-year performance, MDLV leads with 12.71% vs 12.37% for DVAL. On fees, DVAL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MDLV or DVAL?

Over the 3-year period, MDLV has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 12.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MDLV or DVAL?

DVAL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for MDLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MDLV or DVAL?

MDLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 1.77% for DVAL.

What is the main difference between MDLV and DVAL?

They also come from different issuers: Morgan Dempsey and BrandywineGLOBAL. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for MDLV and 0.49% for DVAL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MDLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.