PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDLOX vs. WMRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDLOX vs. WMRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MDLOX) and Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDLOX achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than WMRIX's 17.01% return. Over the past 10 years, MDLOX has outperformed WMRIX with an annualized return of 7.89%, while WMRIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.53% annualized return.


MDLOX

1D
1.66%
1M
-1.55%
6M
3.20%
YTD
6.06%
1Y
15.28%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
5.42%
10Y*
7.89%
ALL TIME*
7.97%

WMRIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
4.19%
6M
9.61%
YTD
17.01%
1Y
25.22%
3Y*
10.64%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
5.53%
ALL TIME*
6.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MDLOX vs. WMRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDLOX
BlackRock Global Allocation Fund
6.06%19.38%9.00%12.35%-16.08%6.40%24.62%17.23%-7.66%13.30%
WMRIX
Wilmington Real Asset Fund
17.01%12.79%2.57%1.12%-8.03%21.49%-2.19%16.85%-7.21%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MDLOX and WMRIX is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2003

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between MDLOX and WMRIX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDLOX vs. WMRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MDLOX
MDLOX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MDLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

WMRIX
WMRIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
WMRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
WMRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MDLOX vs. WMRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MDLOX) and Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDLOXWMRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.47

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

3.27

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.11

11.12

-4.02

MDLOX vs. WMRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDLOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the WMRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDLOX and WMRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDLOX vs. WMRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDLOX drawdown since its inception was -32.96%, smaller than the maximum WMRIX drawdown of -37.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLOX and WMRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDLOXWMRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.96%

-37.84%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-7.13%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

-10.95%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.89%

-22.03%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.89%

-31.27%

+8.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-2.03%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.46%

-7.15%

+2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

2.10%

-0.05%

Volatility

MDLOX vs. WMRIX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MDLOX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) at 1.99%. This indicates that MDLOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDLOXWMRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

1.99%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

6.65%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.71%

8.89%

+1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.02%

11.44%

-0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.74%

12.51%

-1.77%

MDLOX vs. WMRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDLOX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than WMRIX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDLOX vs. WMRIX - Dividend Comparison

MDLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%, more than WMRIX's 6.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDLOX
BlackRock Global Allocation Fund
10.68%9.07%7.50%1.15%5.98%10.11%10.01%5.44%5.21%4.56%1.81%9.49%
WMRIX
Wilmington Real Asset Fund
6.09%7.15%1.02%3.51%6.07%9.29%1.99%3.03%2.84%2.73%0.00%5.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDLOX and WMRIX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDLOX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to WMRIX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLOX dropped -32.96% vs WMRIX's -37.84%.

WMRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDLOX and WMRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer