PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDLOX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDLOX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MDLOX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDLOX achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, MDLOX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 7.89%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


MDLOX

1D
1.66%
1M
-1.55%
6M
3.20%
YTD
6.06%
1Y
15.28%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
5.42%
10Y*
7.89%
ALL TIME*
7.97%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

MDLOX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDLOX
BlackRock Global Allocation Fund
6.06%19.38%9.00%12.35%-16.08%6.40%24.62%17.23%-7.66%13.30%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MDLOX and VOO is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.90

The correlation between MDLOX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDLOX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MDLOX
MDLOX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MDLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MDLOX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MDLOX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDLOXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

2.21

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.11

9.44

-2.33

MDLOX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDLOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDLOX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDLOX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDLOX drawdown since its inception was -32.96%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLOX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDLOXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.96%

-33.99%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-8.90%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

-18.69%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.89%

-24.52%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.89%

-33.99%

+11.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-1.38%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.46%

-3.67%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

2.08%

-0.03%

Volatility

MDLOX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MDLOX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 3.40% and 3.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDLOXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

3.54%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

10.10%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.71%

12.82%

-2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.02%

16.93%

-5.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.74%

18.01%

-7.27%

MDLOX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDLOX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDLOX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

MDLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDLOX
BlackRock Global Allocation Fund
10.68%9.07%7.50%1.15%5.98%10.11%10.01%5.44%5.21%4.56%1.81%9.49%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MDLOX and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOO has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to MDLOX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLOX dropped -32.96% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDLOX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer