PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDIV vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDIV vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDIV achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, MDIV has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 4.66%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


MDIV

1D
-0.65%
1M
0.10%
YTD
7.68%
6M
7.38%
1Y
11.03%
3Y*
11.41%
5Y*
5.65%
10Y*
4.66%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDIV vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDIV
First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund
7.68%3.77%10.05%11.50%-3.86%16.51%-14.84%18.59%-5.78%5.61%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MDIV and VOO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2012

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between MDIV and VOO has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MDIV vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDIV
VOO

Financial Services

22.4%
11.6%

Real Estate

21.6%
1.9%

Energy

17.6%
3.5%

Utilities

9.6%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
4.9%

Communication Services

3.2%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.2%
10.2%

Healthcare

1.6%
8.5%

Industrials

1.6%
8.3%

Basic Materials

0.7%
1.8%

Technology

-

35.7%

Financial Services

MDIV
22.4%
VOO
11.6%

Real Estate

MDIV
21.6%
VOO
1.9%

Energy

MDIV
17.6%
VOO
3.5%

Utilities

MDIV
9.6%
VOO
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

MDIV
8.0%
VOO
4.9%

Communication Services

MDIV
3.2%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MDIV
3.2%
VOO
10.2%

Healthcare

MDIV
1.6%
VOO
8.5%

Industrials

MDIV
1.6%
VOO
8.3%

Basic Materials

MDIV
0.7%
VOO
1.8%

Technology

MDIV

-

VOO
35.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDIV vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDIV
MDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDIV vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDIVVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.43

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.16

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.10

14.73

-5.63

MDIV vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDIV and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDIVVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.39

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.83

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.87

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.89

-0.54

Drawdowns

MDIV vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDIV drawdown since its inception was -48.50%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIV and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDIVVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.50%

-33.99%

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.39%

-8.90%

+5.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.62%

-18.69%

+9.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.02%

-24.52%

+11.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.50%

-33.99%

-14.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-0.70%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-3.69%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

1.91%

-0.69%

Volatility

MDIV vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) is 1.62%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that MDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDIVVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

2.84%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.32%

8.90%

-4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.71%

11.80%

-5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.93%

16.81%

-5.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.23%

18.01%

-2.78%

MDIV vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDIV has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDIV vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

MDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDIV
First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund
6.39%6.51%6.40%6.08%6.71%5.30%6.00%5.90%6.76%6.04%6.35%7.38%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDIV and VOO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to MDIV (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDIV dropped -48.50% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 4.66% for MDIV. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MDIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for MDIV.

MDIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.39%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

MDIV is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VOO is S&P 500. MDIV tracks NASDAQ US Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for MDIV and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDIV and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer