MDGCX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
MDGCX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 4, 1994. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
MDGCX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MDGCX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. | -1.19% | 23.61% | 10.87% | 22.43% | -17.94% | 17.52% | 15.61% | 25.54% | -11.73% | 23.41% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDGCX achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, MDGCX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 10.95%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
MDGCX
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -7.57%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- 2.48%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 10.95%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MDGCX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDGCX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MDGCX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
MDGCX
FGIAX
MDGCX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDGCX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 1.75 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | 2.26 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.35 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 2.61 | -0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.28 | 12.12 | -2.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDGCX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 1.75 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.80 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.58 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.42 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between MDGCX and FGIAX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MDGCX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
MDGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.02%, less than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. | 9.02% | 8.91% | 7.78% | 1.42% | 1.75% | 16.75% | 3.77% | 1.73% | 4.06% | 34.82% | 0.65% | 5.18% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
MDGCX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDGCX drawdown since its inception was -48.25%, roughly equal to the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDGCX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDGCX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.25% | -49.35% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.93% | -8.29% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.68% | -21.08% | -5.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.87% | -38.02% | +3.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.07% | -3.78% | -4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.98% | -7.22% | -2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 1.78% | +0.52% |
Volatility
MDGCX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that MDGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MDGCX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 4.05% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.56% | 7.09% | +2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.83% | 12.28% | +4.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 13.08% | +2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 15.17% | +2.04% |