MDGCX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
MDGCX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 4, 1994. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
MDGCX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MDGCX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. | -1.19% | 23.61% | 10.87% | 22.43% | -17.94% | 17.52% | 15.61% | 25.54% | -11.73% | 23.41% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDGCX achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MDGCX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 10.95%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
MDGCX
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -7.57%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- 2.48%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 10.95%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MDGCX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDGCX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MDGCX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
MDGCX
FASGX
MDGCX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDGCX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 1.21 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | 1.73 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.26 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 1.55 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.28 | 6.89 | +2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDGCX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 1.21 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.53 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.70 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.60 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between MDGCX and FASGX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MDGCX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
MDGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.02%, more than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. | 9.02% | 8.91% | 7.78% | 1.42% | 1.75% | 16.75% | 3.77% | 1.73% | 4.06% | 34.82% | 0.65% | 5.18% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
MDGCX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDGCX drawdown since its inception was -48.25%, roughly equal to the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDGCX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDGCX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.25% | -47.35% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.93% | -9.07% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.68% | -23.54% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.87% | -27.20% | -7.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.07% | -7.95% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.98% | -6.74% | -3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 2.04% | +0.26% |
Volatility
MDGCX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 4.57%. This indicates that MDGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MDGCX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 4.57% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.56% | 7.78% | +1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.83% | 12.82% | +4.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 12.14% | +3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 12.56% | +4.65% |