MDCPX vs. FASGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MDCPX (BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares) and FASGX (Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, MDCPX returned 10.29%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for FASGX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDCPX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FASGX.

Performance

MDCPX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares (MDCPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDCPX achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.93% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MDCPX having a 10.29% annualized return and FASGX not far behind at 10.01%.

MDCPX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 3.59%
• YTD: 8.99%
• 6M: 9.94%
• 1Y: 20.18%
• 3Y*: 15.09%
• 5Y*: 8.63%
• 10Y*: 10.29%

FASGX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 4.40%
• YTD: 11.93%
• 6M: 12.90%
• 1Y: 26.54%
• 3Y*: 16.47%
• 5Y*: 8.47%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDCPX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MDCPX BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares	8.99%	15.32%	12.47%	16.59%	-15.70%	16.49%	15.07%	21.59%	-3.48%	14.24%
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	11.93%	18.23%	10.81%	16.45%	-16.83%	13.98%	17.19%	22.81%	-7.65%	17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MDCPX and FASGX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 1994	0.92

The correlation between MDCPX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MDCPX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDCPX

MDCPX Risk / Return Rank: 72
MDCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
MDCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
MDCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MDCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MDCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

FASGX

FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDCPX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares (MDCPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MDCPX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	2.61	-0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	3.64	-0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.49	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	3.39	-0.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.29	14.98	-0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MDCPX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDCPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDCPX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MDCPX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	2.61	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	0.69	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90	0.79	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.63	+0.03

Drawdowns

MDCPX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDCPX drawdown since its inception was -41.98%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDCPX and FASGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDCPX	FASGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.98%	-47.35%	+5.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.22%	-7.95%	+1.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.65%	-12.80%	+2.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.99%	-23.54%	+1.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.58%	-27.20%	+2.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.09%	-6.71%	+1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.42%	1.79%	-0.37%

Volatility

MDCPX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares (MDCPX) is 2.59%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that MDCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MDCPX	FASGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.59%	3.30%	-0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.69%	8.39%	-1.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.27%	10.34%	-2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.06%	12.27%	-1.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.46%	12.65%	-1.19%

MDCPX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDCPX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

MDCPX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

MDCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.90%, more than FASGX's 6.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	6.55%	7.33%	4.60%	1.72%	6.69%	2.73%	2.20%	5.19%	6.31%	2.75%	0.20%	5.58%
MDCPX BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares	7.90%	8.61%	7.44%	2.63%	3.82%	12.27%	4.02%	5.25%	7.84%	19.39%	4.67%	5.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDCPX and FASGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, MDCPX and FASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MDCPX or FASGX?

FASGX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to MDCPX (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDCPX dropped -41.98% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.