PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDCPX vs. FSAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDCPX vs. FSAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares (MDCPX) and Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class A (FSAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDCPX achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than FSAAX's 10.25% return. Over the past 10 years, MDCPX has outperformed FSAAX with an annualized return of 10.29%, while FSAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.56% annualized return.


MDCPX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.59%
YTD
8.99%
6M
9.94%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
10.29%

FSAAX

1D
0.43%
1M
3.83%
YTD
10.25%
6M
11.01%
1Y
23.04%
3Y*
14.36%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
8.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDCPX vs. FSAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDCPX
BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares
8.99%15.32%12.47%16.59%-15.70%16.49%15.07%21.59%-3.48%14.24%
FSAAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class A
10.25%16.24%9.13%14.38%-16.42%11.48%15.71%20.23%-6.88%14.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MDCPX and FSAAX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2007

0.94

The correlation between MDCPX and FSAAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDCPX vs. FSAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDCPX
MDCPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MDCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MDCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FSAAX
FSAAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FSAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDCPX vs. FSAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares (MDCPX) and Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class A (FSAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDCPXFSAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.49

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

3.28

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.29

14.36

-0.08

MDCPX vs. FSAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDCPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the FSAAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDCPX and FSAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDCPXFSAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.56

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.65

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.78

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.53

+0.14

Drawdowns

MDCPX vs. FSAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDCPX drawdown since its inception was -41.98%, roughly equal to the maximum FSAAX drawdown of -41.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDCPX and FSAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDCPXFSAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.98%

-41.63%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.22%

-7.13%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.65%

-10.99%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.99%

-22.62%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.58%

-24.38%

-0.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-5.58%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

1.62%

-0.20%

Volatility

MDCPX vs. FSAAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares (MDCPX) is 2.59%, while Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class A (FSAAX) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that MDCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDCPXFSAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

3.03%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.69%

7.46%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.27%

9.13%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.06%

10.79%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.46%

10.98%

+0.48%

MDCPX vs. FSAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDCPX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than FSAAX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDCPX vs. FSAAX - Dividend Comparison

MDCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.90%, more than FSAAX's 5.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSAAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class A
5.06%5.57%2.99%1.64%4.12%2.27%1.60%3.83%4.15%1.78%0.20%3.80%
MDCPX
BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares
7.90%8.61%7.44%2.63%3.82%12.27%4.02%5.25%7.84%19.39%4.67%5.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, MDCPX and FSAAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSAAX has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to MDCPX (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDCPX dropped -41.98% vs FSAAX's -41.63%.

FSAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDCPX and FSAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer