MDAA vs. EAOA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) and EAOA (iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. MDAA is actively managed, while EAOA is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDAA charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOA.

Performance

MDAA vs. EAOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDAA achieves a 22.13% return, which is significantly higher than EAOA's 9.93% return.

MDAA

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 8.24%
• YTD: 22.13%
• 6M: 22.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EAOA

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 4.36%
• YTD: 9.93%
• 6M: 10.44%
• 1Y: 24.37%
• 3Y*: 17.20%
• 5Y*: 8.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDAA vs. EAOA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	22.13%	-0.27%
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF	9.93%	1.87%

Correlation

The correlation between MDAA and EAOA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025	0.91

Return for Risk

MDAA vs. EAOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOA

EAOA Risk / Return Rank: 68
EAOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
EAOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
EAOA Omega Ratio Rank: 68
EAOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EAOA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDAA vs. EAOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MDAA	EAOA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.47	0.93	+0.54

Drawdowns

MDAA vs. EAOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDAA drawdown since its inception was -14.59%, smaller than the maximum EAOA drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDAA and EAOA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDAA	EAOA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.59%	-25.06%	+10.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.17%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.11%	-0.71%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.93%	-5.31%	+2.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.84%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MDAA	EAOA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.64%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.89%	10.75%	+13.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.89%	13.25%	+10.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.89%	13.14%	+10.75%

MDAA vs. EAOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDAA has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOA's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

MDAA vs. EAOA - Dividend Comparison

MDAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than EAOA's 1.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF	1.95%	2.10%	2.09%	2.21%	1.93%	1.48%	1.12%
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	0.38%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDAA and EAOA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, MDAA and EAOA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, MDAA or EAOA?

On fees, EAOA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MDAA or EAOA?

EAOA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MDAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MDAA or EAOA?

EAOA has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.38% for MDAA.

What is the main difference between MDAA and EAOA?

They also come from different issuers: Myriad and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MDAA and 0.18% for EAOA.