MDAA vs. BAMY
Compare and contrast key facts about Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY).
MDAA and BAMY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MDAA is an actively managed fund by Myriad. It was launched on Oct 3, 2025. BAMY is an actively managed fund by Brookstone. It was launched on Sep 27, 2023.
Performance
MDAA vs. BAMY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MDAA vs. BAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 0.65% | -0.27% |
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF | -0.46% | 2.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDAA achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly higher than BAMY's -0.46% return.
MDAA
- 1D
- 4.21%
- 1M
- -9.77%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAMY
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 2.71%
- 1Y
- 12.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MDAA vs. BAMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDAA has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMY's 1.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MDAA vs. BAMY — Risk / Return Rank
MDAA
BAMY
MDAA vs. BAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDAA | BAMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 1.85 | -1.82 |
Correlation
The correlation between MDAA and BAMY is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MDAA vs. BAMY - Dividend Comparison
MDAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than BAMY's 8.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF | 8.04% | 7.16% | 8.20% | 1.96% |
Drawdowns
MDAA vs. BAMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDAA drawdown since its inception was -14.59%, which is greater than BAMY's maximum drawdown of -6.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDAA and BAMY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDAA | BAMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.59% | -6.03% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.00% | -1.42% | -9.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -0.54% | -2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.84% | — |
Volatility
MDAA vs. BAMY - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MDAA | BAMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.34% | 6.77% | +15.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 6.16% | +16.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 6.16% | +16.18% |