MCD vs. XLY
MCD (McDonald's Corporation) is a stock, while XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) is Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, MCD returned 11.46%/yr vs 12.78%/yr for XLY. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MCD vs. XLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCD achieves a -5.66% return, which is significantly lower than XLY's -2.16% return. Over the past 10 years, MCD has underperformed XLY with an annualized return of 11.46%, while XLY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.78% annualized return.
MCD
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- -5.66%
- 6M
- -8.96%
- 1Y
- -3.37%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
XLY
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -3.01%
- 1Y
- 11.01%
- 3Y*
- 12.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
MCD vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCD McDonald's Corporation | -5.66% | 7.89% | 0.14% | 15.06% | 0.51% | 27.79% | 11.30% | 13.97% | 5.78% | 45.05% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -2.16% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | 1.58% | 22.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCD and XLY is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MCD and XLY has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCD vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank
MCD
XLY
MCD vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCD | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.10 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 0.67 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 2.05 | -2.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCD vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCD drawdown since its inception was -73.20%, which is greater than XLY's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCD and XLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCD | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.20% | -59.05% | -14.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.05% | -14.98% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.05% | -26.01% | +6.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.05% | -39.67% | +20.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.90% | -39.67% | +2.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.46% | -6.17% | -9.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.89% | -9.55% | -5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.53% | 4.88% | +2.65% |
Volatility
MCD vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is 4.96%, while Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that MCD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCD | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 6.19% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.20% | 13.44% | -1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.62% | 18.27% | -1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 23.83% | -6.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 22.08% | -1.68% |
Dividends
MCD vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison
MCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than XLY's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCD McDonald's Corporation | 2.58% | 2.35% | 2.34% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.96% | 2.35% | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.97% | 2.91% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCD and XLY have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLY has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to MCD (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCD dropped -73.20% vs XLY's -59.05%.
XLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCD and XLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer