MCD vs. RR.L
MCD (McDonald's Corporation) and RR.L (Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC) are both stocks. MCD operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while RR.L operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, MCD returned 11.46%/yr vs 20.35%/yr for RR.L. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MCD vs. RR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MCD is traded in USD, while RR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCD achieves a -5.66% return, which is significantly lower than RR.L's 13.72% return. Over the past 10 years, MCD has underperformed RR.L with an annualized return of 11.46%, while RR.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.35% annualized return.
MCD
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- -5.66%
- 6M
- -8.96%
- 1Y
- -3.77%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
RR.L
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 7.52%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 6M
- 20.08%
- 1Y
- 46.28%
- 3Y*
- 110.91%
- 5Y*
- 62.35%
- 10Y*
- 20.35%
MCD vs. RR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCD McDonald's Corporation | -5.66% | 7.89% | 0.14% | 15.06% | 0.51% | 27.79% | 11.30% | 13.97% | 5.78% | 45.05% |
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 13.72% | 120.24% | 86.56% | 238.53% | -32.26% | 9.45% | -51.10% | -13.17% | -6.26% | 39.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCD and RR.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007 | 0.18 |
The correlation between MCD and RR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MCD:
$203.21B
RR.L:
£109.90B
MCD:
$12.13
RR.L:
£0.99
MCD:
23.48
RR.L:
13.19
MCD:
3.78
RR.L:
0.03
MCD:
7.42
RR.L:
2.75
MCD:
$27.45B
RR.L:
£40.12B
MCD:
$12.10B
RR.L:
£10.12B
MCD:
$14.46B
RR.L:
£9.20B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCD vs. RR.L — Risk / Return Rank
MCD
RR.L
MCD vs. RR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCD | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.23 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 2.31 | -2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 6.56 | -7.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCD vs. RR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCD drawdown since its inception was -73.20%, smaller than the maximum RR.L drawdown of -92.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCD and RR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCD | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.20% | -92.32% | +19.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.05% | -19.98% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.05% | -23.51% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.05% | -64.03% | +44.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.90% | -89.47% | +52.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.46% | -3.49% | -11.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.89% | -36.66% | +21.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.53% | 7.04% | +0.49% |
Volatility
MCD vs. RR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is 4.96%, while Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) has a volatility of 12.44%. This indicates that MCD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCD | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 12.44% | -7.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.20% | 32.55% | -20.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.62% | 37.87% | -21.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 43.93% | -26.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 50.21% | -29.81% |
Dividends
MCD vs. RR.L - Dividend Comparison
MCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than RR.L's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCD McDonald's Corporation | 2.58% | 2.35% | 2.34% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.96% | 2.35% | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.97% | 2.91% |
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 0.73% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.71% | 1.41% | 0.54% | 1.75% | 4.06% |
Financials
MCD vs. RR.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McDonald's Corporation and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MCD vs. RR.L - Profitability Comparison
MCD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McDonald's Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RR.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 11.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
MCD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McDonald's Corporation reported an operating income of 2.95B and revenue of 6.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.3%.
RR.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported an operating income of 3.25B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
MCD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McDonald's Corporation reported a net income of 1.98B and revenue of 6.52B, resulting in a net margin of 30.4%.
RR.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a net income of 1.43B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MCD and RR.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MCD and RR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer