PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MC.PA vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MC.PA vs. QQQ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

MC.PA (LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, MC.PA returned 16.10%/yr vs 21.40%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MC.PA vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MC.PA is traded in EUR, while QQQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MC.PA achieves a -19.55% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 19.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MC.PA has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 16.10%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.40% annualized return.

MC.PA

1D
3.53%
1M
10.80%
YTD
-19.55%
6M
-16.91%
1Y
13.44%
3Y*
-13.46%
5Y*
-3.38%
10Y*
16.10%

QQQ

1D
0.67%
1M
1.10%
YTD
19.38%
6M
19.60%
1Y
37.34%
3Y*
23.53%
5Y*
17.92%
10Y*
21.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MC.PA vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne		-19.55%3.93%-11.73%9.60%-4.76%43.83%24.66%63.17%7.31%37.90%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF		19.38%6.44%33.87%50.21%-28.40%36.95%36.37%42.10%4.56%16.36%

Correlation

The correlation between MC.PA and QQQ is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007

0.33

The correlation between MC.PA and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne

Invesco QQQ ETF

Often compared with MC.PA:
MC.PA vs. LVMUYMC.PA vs. RMS.PAMC.PA vs. KER.PAMC.PA vs. CDI.PAMC.PA vs. LRLCYMC.PA vs. CLHMC.PA vs. ELF
Often compared with QQQ:
QQQ vs. SPYQQQ vs. VOOQQQ vs. VGTQQQ vs. TQQQQQQ vs. SMHQQQ vs. QQQMQQQ vs. QQQI

Return for Risk

MC.PA vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MC.PA
MC.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MC.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MC.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MC.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MC.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MC.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MC.PA vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MC.PAQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.37
2.13

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.79
2.70

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.37

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

3.29

-2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.74

10.16

-9.42

MC.PA vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MC.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MC.PA and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MC.PA vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MC.PA drawdown since its inception was -54.74%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MC.PA and QQQ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MC.PAQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.74%

-46.01%

-8.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.65%

-11.01%

-19.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.87%

-27.21%

-21.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.03%

-30.99%

-18.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.03%

-30.99%

-18.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.02%

-2.83%

-36.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.08%

-7.79%

-4.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.58%

3.56%

+12.02%

Volatility

MC.PA vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.71%. This indicates that MC.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MC.PAQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

6.71%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.54%

12.91%

+8.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.28%

17.05%

+14.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.90%

22.17%

+7.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.93%

22.67%

+5.26%

Dividends

MC.PA vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

MC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than QQQ's 0.39% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne		2.55%2.02%2.05%1.70%1.76%0.96%0.90%1.50%2.09%1.71%1.98%2.28%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF		0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

MC.PA and QQQ have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MC.PA and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer