PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MC.PA vs. CDI.PA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MC.PACDI.PA
YTD Return7.61%5.44%
1Y Return-8.93%-9.60%
3Y Return (Ann)9.64%8.02%
5Y Return (Ann)18.40%12.08%
10Y Return (Ann)21.72%20.57%
Sharpe Ratio-0.35-0.40
Daily Std Dev27.35%25.57%
Max Drawdown-70.25%-69.37%
Current Drawdown-11.10%-12.44%

Fundamentals


MC.PACDI.PA
Market Cap€395.74B€133.68B
EPS€30.34€34.90
PE Ratio26.1121.23
PEG Ratio2.580.00
Revenue (TTM)€86.15B€86.15B
Gross Profit (TTM)€54.20B€54.20B
EBITDA (TTM)€25.27B€25.14B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between MC.PA and CDI.PA is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

MC.PA vs. CDI.PA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MC.PA achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly higher than CDI.PA's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, MC.PA has outperformed CDI.PA with an annualized return of 21.72%, while CDI.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 20.57% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


6,000.00%8,000.00%10,000.00%12,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6,090.61%
11,455.24%
MC.PA
CDI.PA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne

Christian Dior SE

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MC.PA vs. CDI.PA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and Christian Dior SE (CDI.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MC.PA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.39, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.39
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.39
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.95
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.37
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.65, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.65
CDI.PA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CDI.PA, currently valued at -0.43, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.43
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CDI.PA, currently valued at -0.47, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.47
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CDI.PA, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.94
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CDI.PA, currently valued at -0.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CDI.PA, currently valued at -0.75, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.75

MC.PA vs. CDI.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MC.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which roughly equals the CDI.PA Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MC.PA and CDI.PA.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.200.400.60December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.39
-0.43
MC.PA
CDI.PA

Dividends

MC.PA vs. CDI.PA - Dividend Comparison

MC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than CDI.PA's 1.76% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
1.66%1.70%1.76%0.96%0.90%1.50%2.09%1.71%1.98%2.28%3.58%2.26%
CDI.PA
Christian Dior SE
1.76%1.77%1.76%0.96%1.01%1.36%1.62%0.99%1.78%2.04%1.93%2.11%

Drawdowns

MC.PA vs. CDI.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MC.PA drawdown since its inception was -70.25%, roughly equal to the maximum CDI.PA drawdown of -69.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MC.PA and CDI.PA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-14.51%
-14.60%
MC.PA
CDI.PA

Volatility

MC.PA vs. CDI.PA - Volatility Comparison

LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and Christian Dior SE (CDI.PA) have volatilities of 7.31% and 6.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.31%
6.97%
MC.PA
CDI.PA

Financials

MC.PA vs. CDI.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne and Christian Dior SE. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in EUR except per share items