PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MC.PA vs. CLH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

MC.PA vs. CLH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MC.PA vs. CLH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
-26.96%3.93%-11.73%9.60%-4.76%43.83%24.66%63.17%7.31%37.90%
CLH
Clean Harbors, Inc.
25.60%-10.21%40.58%48.33%21.47%40.91%-18.57%77.68%-4.67%-14.57%
Different Trading Currencies

MC.PA is traded in EUR, while CLH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CLH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MC.PA achieves a -26.96% return, which is significantly lower than CLH's 25.60% return. Over the past 10 years, MC.PA has underperformed CLH with an annualized return of 14.21%, while CLH has yielded a comparatively higher 19.08% annualized return.


MC.PA

1D
1.73%
1M
-9.49%
YTD
-26.96%
6M
-9.32%
1Y
-16.12%
3Y*
-16.07%
5Y*
-2.11%
10Y*
14.21%

CLH

1D
1.05%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
25.60%
6M
28.97%
1Y
34.75%
3Y*
24.01%
5Y*
27.94%
10Y*
19.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MC.PA vs. CLH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MC.PA
MC.PA Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MC.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MC.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MC.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MC.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MC.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

CLH
CLH Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLH Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLH Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MC.PA vs. CLH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MC.PACLHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.49

1.24

-1.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.54

1.73

-2.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.24

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

2.02

-2.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.74

6.15

-6.89

MC.PA vs. CLH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MC.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the CLH Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MC.PA and CLH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MC.PACLHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.49

1.24

-1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.99

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.55

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.44

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between MC.PA and CLH is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MC.PA vs. CLH - Dividend Comparison

MC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, while CLH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
2.76%2.02%2.05%1.70%1.76%0.96%0.90%1.50%2.09%1.71%1.98%2.28%
CLH
Clean Harbors, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MC.PA vs. CLH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MC.PA drawdown since its inception was -70.25%, which is greater than CLH's maximum drawdown of -64.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MC.PA and CLH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MC.PACLHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.25%

-93.48%

+23.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.11%

-19.45%

-10.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.03%

-30.86%

-18.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.03%

-64.51%

+15.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.64%

-2.39%

-42.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.25%

-33.05%

+16.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.06%

5.85%

+6.21%

Volatility

MC.PA vs. CLH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) is 6.72%, while Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) has a volatility of 7.89%. This indicates that MC.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MC.PACLHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.72%

7.89%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.33%

21.81%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.44%

28.33%

+4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.48%

28.40%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.75%

35.10%

-7.35%

Financials

MC.PA vs. CLH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne and Clean Harbors, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. MC.PA values in EUR, CLH values in USD