MBSF vs. PHYL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL).

MBSF and PHYL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MBSF is an actively managed fund by Regan. It was launched on Feb 27, 2024. PHYL is an actively managed fund by Prudential. It was launched on Sep 24, 2018.

Performance

MBSF vs. PHYL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MBSF vs. PHYL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MBSF Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF	0.75%	5.85%	5.71%
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF	-0.40%	9.65%	7.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBSF achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than PHYL's -0.40% return.

MBSF

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 0.75%
• 6M: 2.41%
• 1Y: 5.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PHYL

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -1.10%
• YTD: -0.40%
• 6M: 0.83%
• 1Y: 7.48%
• 3Y*: 8.73%
• 5Y*: 4.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBSF vs. PHYL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBSF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PHYL's 0.53% expense ratio.

PHYL

PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF

MBSF

Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF

Return for Risk

MBSF vs. PHYL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBSF

MBSF Risk / Return Rank: 89
MBSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
MBSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
MBSF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
MBSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
MBSF Martin Ratio Rank: 96

PHYL

PHYL Risk / Return Rank: 83
PHYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
PHYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PHYL Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PHYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
PHYL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBSF vs. PHYL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MBSF	PHYL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.69	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	2.35	+0.26
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.39	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.70	2.05	+4.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.07	9.77	+9.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MBSF vs. PHYL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the PHYL Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBSF and PHYL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MBSF	PHYL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	1.69	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.74	0.69	+1.04

Correlation

The correlation between MBSF and PHYL is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MBSF vs. PHYL - Dividend Comparison

MBSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than PHYL's 7.18% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MBSF Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF	4.63%	4.71%	4.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF	7.18%	7.05%	8.28%	7.62%	6.55%	6.13%	7.51%	7.31%	1.79%

Drawdowns

MBSF vs. PHYL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBSF drawdown since its inception was -0.97%, smaller than the maximum PHYL drawdown of -22.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBSF and PHYL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBSF	PHYL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-22.07%	+21.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.79%	-3.80%	+3.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-1.48%	+1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.23%	-3.13%	+2.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	0.80%	-0.52%

Volatility

MBSF vs. PHYL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) is 1.42%, while PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) has a volatility of 1.91%. This indicates that MBSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHYL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MBSF	PHYL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.42%	1.91%	-0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.29%	2.52%	-0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.09%	4.46%	-1.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.42%	5.66%	-2.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.42%	7.72%	-4.30%