PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MBSF vs. CLOZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MBSF and CLOZ is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

MBSF vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.16%
5.84%
MBSF
CLOZ

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

MBSF:

3.80%

CLOZ:

1.72%

Max Drawdown

MBSF:

-0.97%

CLOZ:

-2.70%

Current Drawdown

MBSF:

-0.45%

CLOZ:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBSF achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than CLOZ's 1.48% return.


MBSF

YTD

0.80%

1M

-0.18%

6M

2.09%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CLOZ

YTD

1.48%

1M

0.92%

6M

6.05%

1Y

11.67%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MBSF vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBSF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.


CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
Expense ratio chart for CLOZ: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%
Expense ratio chart for MBSF: current value at 0.49% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.49%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MBSF vs. CLOZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBSF

CLOZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MBSF vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
No data
MBSF
CLOZ


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

MBSF vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

MBSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, less than CLOZ's 8.78% yield.


TTM20242023
MBSF
Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF
4.45%4.14%0.00%
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
8.78%9.09%8.81%

Drawdowns

MBSF vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBSF drawdown since its inception was -0.97%, smaller than the maximum CLOZ drawdown of -2.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBSF and CLOZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-1.00%-0.80%-0.60%-0.40%-0.20%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.45%
0
MBSF
CLOZ

Volatility

MBSF vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) at 0.21%. This indicates that MBSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.24%
0.21%
MBSF
CLOZ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab