PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MBSF vs. CLOZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


MBSFCLOZ
Daily Std Dev3.78%2.33%
Max Drawdown-0.95%-2.70%
Current Drawdown-0.43%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between MBSF and CLOZ is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

MBSF vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
3.94%
5.31%
MBSF
CLOZ

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MBSF vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBSF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.


CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
Expense ratio chart for CLOZ: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%
Expense ratio chart for MBSF: current value at 0.49% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.49%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MBSF vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBSF
Sharpe ratio
No data
CLOZ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLOZ, currently valued at 5.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.005.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLOZ, currently valued at 7.99, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.007.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLOZ, currently valued at 2.64, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.502.64
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLOZ, currently valued at 9.13, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.009.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLOZ, currently valued at 53.63, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0053.63

MBSF vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

MBSF vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

MBSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than CLOZ's 8.74% yield.


TTM2023
MBSF
Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF
2.27%0.00%
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
8.74%8.81%

Drawdowns

MBSF vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBSF drawdown since its inception was -0.95%, smaller than the maximum CLOZ drawdown of -2.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBSF and CLOZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-1.40%-1.20%-1.00%-0.80%-0.60%-0.40%-0.20%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.43%
0
MBSF
CLOZ

Volatility

MBSF vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) has a higher volatility of 1.13% compared to Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) at 0.49%. This indicates that MBSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.13%
0.49%
MBSF
CLOZ