PortfoliosLab logo
MBSF vs. BINC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MBSF and BINC is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MBSF vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and BlackRock Flexible Income ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MBSF:

1.48

BINC:

2.54

Sortino Ratio

MBSF:

2.25

BINC:

3.37

Omega Ratio

MBSF:

1.29

BINC:

1.55

Calmar Ratio

MBSF:

5.79

BINC:

3.02

Martin Ratio

MBSF:

15.54

BINC:

13.28

Ulcer Index

MBSF:

0.36%

BINC:

0.54%

Daily Std Dev

MBSF:

3.72%

BINC:

2.88%

Max Drawdown

MBSF:

-0.97%

BINC:

-2.37%

Current Drawdown

MBSF:

-0.25%

BINC:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBSF achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than BINC's 2.55% return.


MBSF

YTD

1.78%

1M

0.13%

6M

1.99%

1Y

5.72%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BINC

YTD

2.55%

1M

0.87%

6M

2.37%

1Y

7.04%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF

BlackRock Flexible Income ETF

MBSF vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBSF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MBSF vs. BINC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBSF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MBSF is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MBSF is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MBSF is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MBSF is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MBSF is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MBSF is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

BINC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BINC is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BINC is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BINC is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BINC is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BINC is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BINC is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MBSF vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and BlackRock Flexible Income ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MBSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the BINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBSF and BINC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MBSF vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

MBSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, less than BINC's 6.44% yield.


TTM20242023
MBSF
Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF
4.94%4.14%0.00%
BINC
BlackRock Flexible Income ETF
6.44%6.13%3.13%

Drawdowns

MBSF vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBSF drawdown since its inception was -0.97%, smaller than the maximum BINC drawdown of -2.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBSF and BINC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MBSF vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison

Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) has a higher volatility of 0.89% compared to BlackRock Flexible Income ETF (BINC) at 0.69%. This indicates that MBSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...