MBOAX vs. MINVX
MBOAX (Madison Core Bond Fund) and MINVX (Madison Investors Fund) are both mutual funds - MBOAX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Madison Funds, while MINVX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Madison Funds. Over the past 10 years, MBOAX returned 1.55%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for MINVX. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. MBOAX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for MINVX.
Performance
MBOAX vs. MINVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MBOAX achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than MINVX's 5.64% return. Over the past 10 years, MBOAX has underperformed MINVX with an annualized return of 1.55%, while MINVX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.94% annualized return.
MBOAX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- 1Y
- 3.75%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- -0.08%
- 10Y*
- 1.55%
MINVX
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 5.64%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- 1Y
- 9.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
MBOAX vs. MINVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBOAX Madison Core Bond Fund | 0.01% | 6.96% | 1.14% | 5.63% | -12.82% | -1.85% | 9.22% | 8.31% | -0.98% | 3.02% |
MINVX Madison Investors Fund | 5.64% | 3.30% | 16.38% | 26.12% | -13.18% | 22.70% | 14.48% | 30.48% | 0.64% | 22.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBOAX and MINVX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 1997 | -0.13 |
The correlation between MBOAX and MINVX shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBOAX vs. MINVX — Risk / Return Rank
MBOAX
MINVX
MBOAX vs. MINVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Core Bond Fund (MBOAX) and Madison Investors Fund (MINVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MBOAX | MINVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.14 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 1.04 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.01 | 3.12 | +0.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBOAX vs. MINVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBOAX drawdown since its inception was -17.78%, smaller than the maximum MINVX drawdown of -52.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBOAX and MINVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBOAX | MINVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.78% | -52.40% | +34.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -10.00% | +7.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.10% | -16.23% | +10.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.55% | -21.46% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.78% | -33.85% | +16.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -1.40% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -7.56% | +5.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 3.32% | -2.30% |
Volatility
MBOAX vs. MINVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Madison Core Bond Fund (MBOAX) is 0.94%, while Madison Investors Fund (MINVX) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that MBOAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MINVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBOAX | MINVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.94% | 4.36% | -3.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.78% | 10.23% | -7.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73% | 13.61% | -9.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.61% | 16.36% | -10.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 17.05% | -12.39% |
MBOAX vs. MINVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBOAX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than MINVX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBOAX vs. MINVX - Dividend Comparison
MBOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than MINVX's 6.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBOAX Madison Core Bond Fund | 3.49% | 3.39% | 3.27% | 2.73% | 1.88% | 1.85% | 3.77% | 2.42% | 2.48% | 2.28% | 2.72% | 4.60% |
MINVX Madison Investors Fund | 6.91% | 7.30% | 6.09% | 8.18% | 6.64% | 7.82% | 9.86% | 6.02% | 18.77% | 5.91% | 3.31% | 16.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBOAX and MINVX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MINVX has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to MBOAX (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBOAX dropped -17.78% vs MINVX's -52.40%.
MBOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MBOAX and MINVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer