MBCE vs. SCHG
MBCE (Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - MBCE tracks the Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index while SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MBCE charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
MBCE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBCE
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -6.79%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- YTD
- 7.11%
- 1Y
- 18.50%
- 3Y*
- 23.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.47%
- 10Y*
- 18.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $704.30K | $864.91K | $1.01M | |
| $249.58M | $250.01M | $339.80M |
MBCE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF | -7.47% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBCE and SCHG is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBCE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
MBCE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHG
MBCE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MBCE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBCE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBCE drawdown since its inception was -17.37%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCE and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBCE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.37% | -34.59% | +17.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.08% | -1.15% | -10.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.11% | -5.19% | -0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.19% | — |
Volatility
MBCE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBCE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.62% | 16.66% | +24.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.62% | 22.45% | +19.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.62% | 21.60% | +20.02% |
MBCE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBCE has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBCE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
MBCE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBCE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for MBCE.
SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for MBCE.
MBCE tracks Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for MBCE and 0.04% for SCHG.
Find the right allocation for MBCE and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer