PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBCC vs. ROUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBCC vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MBCC

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ROUS

1D
0.01%
1M
6.18%
YTD
16.55%
6M
16.75%
1Y
29.42%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
13.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBCC vs. ROUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MBCC
ROUS

Technology

38.7%
33.2%

Healthcare

14.4%
10.7%

Financial Services

12.1%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
9.6%

Real Estate

7.9%
2.1%

Communication Services

7.8%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
5.8%

Industrials

3.4%
10.4%

Basic Materials

-

2.2%

Energy

-

3.0%

Utilities

-

3.8%

Technology

MBCC
38.7%
ROUS
33.2%

Healthcare

MBCC
14.4%
ROUS
10.7%

Financial Services

MBCC
12.1%
ROUS
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MBCC
11.5%
ROUS
9.6%

Real Estate

MBCC
7.9%
ROUS
2.1%

Communication Services

MBCC
7.8%
ROUS
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

MBCC
4.2%
ROUS
5.8%

Industrials

MBCC
3.4%
ROUS
10.4%

Basic Materials

MBCC

-

ROUS
2.2%

Energy

MBCC

-

ROUS
3.0%

Utilities

MBCC

-

ROUS
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBCC vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBCC

ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBCC vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MBCC vs. ROUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBCCROUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

Drawdowns

MBCC vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBCCROUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

Volatility

MBCC vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBCCROUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

MBCC vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBCC has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBCC vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison

MBCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBCC
Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
1.32%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for MBCC.

ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for MBCC.

MBCC tracks Kingsview Blue Chips Core Index, while ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for MBCC and 0.19% for ROUS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBCC and ROUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer