MBCC vs. NOBL
MBCC (Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MBCC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Kingsview Blue Chips Core Index, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. MBCC charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
MBCC vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBCC
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOBL
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 3.45%
- 1Y
- 9.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
MBCC vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MBCC
NOBL
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MBCC
NOBL
Healthcare
MBCC
NOBL
Financial Services
MBCC
NOBL
Consumer Cyclical
MBCC
NOBL
Real Estate
MBCC
NOBL
Communication Services
MBCC
NOBL
-
Consumer Defensive
MBCC
NOBL
Industrials
MBCC
NOBL
Basic Materials
MBCC
-
NOBL
Energy
MBCC
-
NOBL
Utilities
MBCC
-
NOBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBCC vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
MBCC
NOBL
MBCC vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBCC | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.64 | — |
Drawdowns
MBCC vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBCC | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -35.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -5.99% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -3.48% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.50% | — |
Volatility
MBCC vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBCC | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 11.33% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 14.38% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 16.60% | — |
MBCC vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBCC has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBCC vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
MBCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBCC Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.12% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for MBCC.
NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.00% for MBCC.
MBCC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. MBCC tracks Kingsview Blue Chips Core Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for MBCC and 0.35% for NOBL.
Find the right allocation for MBCC and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer