MBCC vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MBCC (Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. MBCC is passively managed, while MEME is actively managed. MBCC charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

MBCC vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MBCC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MEME

• 1D: -5.29%
• 1M: 25.28%
• YTD: 79.03%
• 6M: 68.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBCC vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MBCC	MEME
Technology	38.7%	58.8%
Healthcare	14.4%	5.4%
Financial Services	12.1%	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	-
Real Estate	7.9%	-
Communication Services	7.8%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	-
Industrials	3.4%	29.9%
Basic Materials	-	4.6%
Energy	-	4.8%
Utilities	-	10.7%

Return for Risk

MBCC vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MBCC	MEME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.28	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MBCC	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-48.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-5.93%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-29.90%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MBCC	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	74.19%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	74.19%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	74.19%	—

MBCC vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBCC has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

MBCC vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

Neither MBCC nor MEME has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, MBCC or MEME?

On fees, MEME is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MBCC or MEME?

MEME is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for MBCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MBCC or MEME?

MBCC and MEME have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MBCC and MEME?

They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for MBCC and 0.69% for MEME.