MBCC vs. BBHL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MBCC (Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF) and BBHL (BBH Select Large Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - MBCC tracks the Kingsview Blue Chips Core Index while BBHL tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. MBCC charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for BBHL.

Performance

MBCC vs. BBHL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) and BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MBCC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBHL

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 3.91%
• YTD: 5.40%
• 6M: 5.12%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MBCC vs. BBHL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) and BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MBCC	BBHL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.26	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MBCC	BBHL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-11.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.53%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-3.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MBCC	BBHL	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	12.70%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	12.70%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	12.70%	—

MBCC vs. BBHL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBCC has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHL's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

MBCC vs. BBHL - Dividend Comparison

Neither MBCC nor BBHL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, MBCC or BBHL?

On fees, BBHL is cheaper at 0.71% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MBCC or BBHL?

BBHL is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for MBCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MBCC or BBHL?

MBCC and BBHL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MBCC and BBHL?

MBCC tracks Kingsview Blue Chips Core Index, while BBHL tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and BBH. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for MBCC and 0.71% for BBHL.