MBBB vs. GDX
MBBB (VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MBBB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS Moody's Analytics US BBB Corporate Bond Index, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MBBB returned 1.11%/yr vs 18.69%/yr for GDX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MBBB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
MBBB vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MBBB achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -0.90% return.
MBBB
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 5.40%
- 3Y*
- 6.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- —
GDX
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 61.27%
- 3Y*
- 41.00%
- 5Y*
- 18.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
MBBB vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBBB VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF | 0.43% | 7.64% | 3.68% | 9.75% | -15.04% | 0.30% | 1.51% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -0.90% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 0.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBBB and GDX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBBB vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
MBBB
GDX
MBBB vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MBBB | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.25 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 2.00 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.86 | 5.13 | +0.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBBB | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.52 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.13 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
MBBB vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBBB drawdown since its inception was -21.73%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBBB and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBBB | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.73% | -80.34% | +58.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.98% | -30.84% | +27.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.64% | -30.84% | +25.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.73% | -46.51% | +24.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -26.62% | +25.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.83% | -40.43% | +33.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 11.99% | -11.07% |
Volatility
MBBB vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB) is 1.52%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 15.40%. This indicates that MBBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBBB | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.52% | 15.40% | -13.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.15% | 37.50% | -34.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.14% | 45.49% | -41.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.36% | 36.39% | -30.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.23% | 37.18% | -30.95% |
MBBB vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBBB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBBB vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
MBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, more than GDX's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.74% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
MBBB VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF | 5.08% | 4.99% | 4.93% | 4.51% | 3.22% | 2.29% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBBB and GDX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to MBBB (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBBB dropped -21.73% vs GDX's -80.34%.
On 5-year performance, GDX leads with 18.69% vs 1.11% for MBBB. On fees, MBBB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, MBBB has been the lower-risk option at 1.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GDX has performed better with a 18.69% return vs 1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MBBB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
MBBB has the higher dividend yield at 5.08%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.
MBBB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while GDX is Gold. MBBB tracks MVIS Moody's Analytics US BBB Corporate Bond Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MBBB and 0.51% for GDX.
GDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MBBB and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer