PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBAPX vs. MMDEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBAPX vs. MMDEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio (MBAPX) and Praxis Growth Index Fund (MMDEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MBAPX having a 8.61% return and MMDEX slightly higher at 8.86%. Over the past 10 years, MBAPX has underperformed MMDEX with an annualized return of 7.74%, while MMDEX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.88% annualized return.


MBAPX

1D
1.00%
1M
1.99%
YTD
8.61%
6M
8.38%
1Y
19.11%
3Y*
12.30%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
7.74%

MMDEX

1D
1.72%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
8.86%
6M
8.34%
1Y
28.59%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
13.23%
10Y*
17.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBAPX vs. MMDEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MBAPX
Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio
8.61%13.46%9.04%14.02%-16.06%8.09%12.98%19.90%-4.91%13.38%
MMDEX
Praxis Growth Index Fund
8.86%18.34%33.44%29.82%-28.23%28.12%33.23%39.87%0.32%26.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MBAPX and MMDEX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2009

0.88

The correlation between MBAPX and MMDEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBAPX vs. MMDEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBAPX
MBAPX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MBAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MBAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

MMDEX
MMDEX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MMDEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMDEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMDEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MMDEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMDEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBAPX vs. MMDEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio (MBAPX) and Praxis Growth Index Fund (MMDEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MBAPXMMDEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.29

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

1.78

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.66

6.19

+6.47

MBAPX vs. MMDEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBAPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the MMDEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBAPX and MMDEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MBAPX vs. MMDEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBAPX drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, smaller than the maximum MMDEX drawdown of -49.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBAPX and MMDEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBAPXMMDEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.54%

-49.99%

+25.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.41%

-15.73%

+9.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.32%

-23.16%

+12.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.54%

-33.36%

+8.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.54%

-33.36%

+8.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-2.95%

+2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-7.94%

+4.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

4.52%

-3.02%

Volatility

MBAPX vs. MMDEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio (MBAPX) is 3.66%, while Praxis Growth Index Fund (MMDEX) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that MBAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMDEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBAPXMMDEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

6.58%

-2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.18%

13.30%

-6.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.63%

16.71%

-8.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.44%

21.01%

-10.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.65%

20.63%

-9.98%

MBAPX vs. MMDEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBAPX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than MMDEX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBAPX vs. MMDEX - Dividend Comparison

MBAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than MMDEX's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBAPX
Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio
4.59%4.93%4.30%2.23%2.82%2.12%4.82%3.80%5.32%3.76%2.99%3.38%
MMDEX
Praxis Growth Index Fund
4.30%4.69%1.65%2.02%5.77%1.42%6.66%12.23%5.03%3.42%1.08%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBAPX and MMDEX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMDEX has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to MBAPX (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBAPX dropped -24.54% vs MMDEX's -49.99%.

MBAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBAPX and MMDEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer