PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMDEX vs. TBCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMDEX vs. TBCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Growth Index Fund (MMDEX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMDEX achieves a 12.14% return, which is significantly higher than TBCIX's 5.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MMDEX having a 18.08% annualized return and TBCIX not far behind at 17.93%.


MMDEX

1D
-0.03%
1M
8.07%
YTD
12.14%
6M
10.90%
1Y
31.98%
3Y*
25.25%
5Y*
14.59%
10Y*
18.08%

TBCIX

1D
-0.69%
1M
5.17%
YTD
5.54%
6M
5.71%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
29.00%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*
17.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMDEX vs. TBCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMDEX
Praxis Growth Index Fund
12.14%18.34%33.44%29.82%-28.23%28.12%33.23%39.87%0.32%26.78%
TBCIX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class
5.54%18.94%48.73%49.61%-38.48%18.30%34.90%30.30%2.13%36.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MMDEX and TBCIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.95

The correlation between MMDEX and TBCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMDEX vs. TBCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMDEX
MMDEX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MMDEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMDEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMDEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MMDEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMDEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

TBCIX
TBCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TBCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TBCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMDEX vs. TBCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Growth Index Fund (MMDEX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMDEXTBCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.26

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

1.36

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.45

4.57

+2.87

MMDEX vs. TBCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMDEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the TBCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMDEX and TBCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMDEXTBCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.47

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.59

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.79

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.76

-0.13

Drawdowns

MMDEX vs. TBCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMDEX drawdown since its inception was -49.99%, which is greater than TBCIX's maximum drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMDEX and TBCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMDEXTBCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.99%

-43.26%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.73%

-16.96%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.16%

-23.06%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

-43.26%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.36%

-43.26%

+9.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.69%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-8.07%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

5.01%

-0.58%

Volatility

MMDEX vs. TBCIX - Volatility Comparison

Praxis Growth Index Fund (MMDEX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) have volatilities of 3.60% and 3.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMDEXTBCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

3.57%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.97%

12.01%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.76%

15.64%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.87%

23.91%

-3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.55%

22.76%

-2.21%

MMDEX vs. TBCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMDEX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than TBCIX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMDEX vs. TBCIX - Dividend Comparison

MMDEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than TBCIX's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMDEX
Praxis Growth Index Fund
4.18%4.69%1.65%2.02%5.77%1.42%6.66%12.23%5.03%3.42%1.08%1.54%
TBCIX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class
4.93%5.20%18.28%3.47%5.84%10.03%1.18%0.59%2.50%3.05%0.81%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, MMDEX and TBCIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MMDEX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to TBCIX (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMDEX dropped -49.99% vs TBCIX's -43.26%.

MMDEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMDEX and TBCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer