PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMDEX vs. MVIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMDEX vs. MVIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Growth Index Fund (MMDEX) and Praxis Value Index Fund (MVIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MMDEX having a 12.14% return and MVIAX slightly lower at 12.13%. Over the past 10 years, MMDEX has outperformed MVIAX with an annualized return of 18.08%, while MVIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.15% annualized return.


MMDEX

1D
-0.03%
1M
8.07%
YTD
12.14%
6M
10.90%
1Y
31.98%
3Y*
25.25%
5Y*
14.59%
10Y*
18.08%

MVIAX

1D
0.87%
1M
4.17%
YTD
12.13%
6M
12.68%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
12.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMDEX vs. MVIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMDEX
Praxis Growth Index Fund
12.14%18.34%33.44%29.82%-28.23%28.12%33.23%39.87%0.32%26.78%
MVIAX
Praxis Value Index Fund
12.13%12.97%10.24%20.04%-7.89%24.54%3.56%34.46%-8.53%16.32%

Correlation

The correlation between MMDEX and MVIAX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2007

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between MMDEX and MVIAX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMDEX vs. MVIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMDEX
MMDEX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MMDEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMDEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMDEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MMDEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMDEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

MVIAX
MVIAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MVIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
MVIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMDEX vs. MVIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Growth Index Fund (MMDEX) and Praxis Value Index Fund (MVIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMDEXMVIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.43

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

3.86

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.45

14.72

-7.27

MMDEX vs. MVIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMDEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the MVIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMDEX and MVIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMDEXMVIAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.43

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.73

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.73

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.34

+0.29

Drawdowns

MMDEX vs. MVIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMDEX drawdown since its inception was -49.99%, smaller than the maximum MVIAX drawdown of -65.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMDEX and MVIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMDEXMVIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.99%

-65.34%

+15.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.73%

-6.29%

-9.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.16%

-15.25%

-7.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

-18.89%

-14.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.36%

-36.03%

+2.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

0.00%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-12.11%

+4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

1.65%

+2.78%

Volatility

MMDEX vs. MVIAX - Volatility Comparison

Praxis Growth Index Fund (MMDEX) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Praxis Value Index Fund (MVIAX) at 2.76%. This indicates that MMDEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMDEXMVIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

2.76%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.97%

7.50%

+4.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.76%

10.01%

+5.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.87%

14.23%

+6.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.55%

16.81%

+3.74%

MMDEX vs. MVIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMDEX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than MVIAX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMDEX vs. MVIAX - Dividend Comparison

MMDEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than MVIAX's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMDEX
Praxis Growth Index Fund
4.18%4.69%1.65%2.02%5.77%1.42%6.66%12.23%5.03%3.42%1.08%1.54%
MVIAX
Praxis Value Index Fund
0.95%1.06%9.59%4.63%5.11%3.63%8.55%4.84%7.28%6.40%2.63%5.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMDEX and MVIAX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMDEX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to MVIAX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMDEX dropped -49.99% vs MVIAX's -65.34%.

MVIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMDEX and MVIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer