MBAPX vs. MPLIX
MBAPX (Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio) and MPLIX (Praxis International Index Fund) are both mutual funds - MBAPX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Praxis Mutual Funds, while MPLIX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Praxis Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, MBAPX returned 7.74%/yr vs 9.92%/yr for MPLIX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MBAPX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for MPLIX.
Performance
MBAPX vs. MPLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MBAPX achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than MPLIX's 16.64% return. Over the past 10 years, MBAPX has underperformed MPLIX with an annualized return of 7.74%, while MPLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.92% annualized return.
MBAPX
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 8.61%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 19.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 5.47%
- 10Y*
- 7.74%
MPLIX
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 16.64%
- 6M
- 17.14%
- 1Y
- 33.68%
- 3Y*
- 18.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
MBAPX vs. MPLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBAPX Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio | 8.61% | 13.46% | 9.04% | 14.02% | -16.06% | 8.09% | 12.98% | 19.90% | -4.91% | 13.38% |
MPLIX Praxis International Index Fund | 16.64% | 29.51% | 6.86% | 15.07% | -16.16% | 7.84% | 13.19% | 20.43% | -14.51% | 25.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBAPX and MPLIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2010 | 0.89 |
The correlation between MBAPX and MPLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBAPX vs. MPLIX — Risk / Return Rank
MBAPX
MPLIX
MBAPX vs. MPLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio (MBAPX) and Praxis International Index Fund (MPLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MBAPX | MPLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.39 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 2.78 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.66 | 10.73 | +1.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBAPX vs. MPLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBAPX drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, smaller than the maximum MPLIX drawdown of -35.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBAPX and MPLIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBAPX | MPLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.54% | -35.25% | +10.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.41% | -11.79% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.32% | -13.35% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.54% | -29.78% | +5.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.54% | -35.25% | +10.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | 0.00% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -8.37% | +4.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.50% | 3.05% | -1.55% |
Volatility
MBAPX vs. MPLIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio (MBAPX) is 3.66%, while Praxis International Index Fund (MPLIX) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that MBAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBAPX | MPLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 6.54% | -2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.18% | 13.47% | -6.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.63% | 15.59% | -6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 15.83% | -5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.65% | 16.48% | -5.83% |
MBAPX vs. MPLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBAPX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than MPLIX's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBAPX vs. MPLIX - Dividend Comparison
MBAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than MPLIX's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBAPX Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio | 4.59% | 4.93% | 4.30% | 2.23% | 2.82% | 2.12% | 4.82% | 3.80% | 5.32% | 3.76% | 2.99% | 3.38% |
MPLIX Praxis International Index Fund | 2.84% | 3.32% | 2.97% | 3.26% | 2.09% | 2.49% | 1.48% | 2.37% | 2.49% | 1.71% | 1.93% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, MBAPX and MPLIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MPLIX has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to MBAPX (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBAPX dropped -24.54% vs MPLIX's -35.25%.
MBAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MBAPX and MPLIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer