MBAPX vs. MCONX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MBAPX (Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio) and MCONX (Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Praxis Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, MBAPX returned 7.78%/yr vs 4.29%/yr for MCONX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MBAPX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for MCONX.

Performance

MBAPX vs. MCONX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio (MBAPX) and Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio (MCONX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBAPX achieves a 7.35% return, which is significantly higher than MCONX's 2.81% return. Over the past 10 years, MBAPX has outperformed MCONX with an annualized return of 7.78%, while MCONX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.29% annualized return.

MBAPX

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 7.35%
• 6M: 6.69%
• 1Y: 16.06%
• 3Y*: 12.39%
• 5Y*: 4.95%
• 10Y*: 7.78%

MCONX

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 2.81%
• 6M: 2.45%
• 1Y: 8.81%
• 3Y*: 7.62%
• 5Y*: 1.97%
• 10Y*: 4.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBAPX vs. MCONX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MBAPX Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio	7.35%	13.46%	9.04%	14.02%	-16.06%	8.09%	12.98%	19.90%	-4.91%	13.38%
MCONX Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio	2.81%	10.15%	5.16%	9.51%	-14.59%	1.66%	10.28%	13.67%	-2.64%	8.36%

Correlation

The correlation between MBAPX and MCONX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2009	0.90

The correlation between MBAPX and MCONX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MBAPX vs. MCONX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBAPX

MBAPX Risk / Return Rank: 63
MBAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
MBAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
MBAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
MBAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
MBAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

MCONX

MCONX Risk / Return Rank: 49
MCONX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
MCONX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
MCONX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
MCONX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
MCONX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBAPX vs. MCONX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio (MBAPX) and Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio (MCONX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MBAPX	MCONX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	1.78	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	2.57	+0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.34	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	2.13	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.39	8.62	+2.76

MBAPX vs. MCONX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the MCONX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBAPX and MCONX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MBAPX vs. MCONX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBAPX drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, which is greater than MCONX's maximum drawdown of -21.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBAPX and MCONX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBAPX	MCONX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.54%	-21.51%	-3.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.41%	-4.45%	-1.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.32%	-7.12%	-3.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.54%	-21.51%	-3.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.54%	-21.51%	-3.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.21%	-0.63%	-0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.70%	-2.97%	-0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.50%	1.10%	+0.40%

Volatility

MBAPX vs. MCONX - Volatility Comparison

Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio (MBAPX) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio (MCONX) at 2.15%. This indicates that MBAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCONX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MBAPX	MCONX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	2.15%	+1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.24%	4.41%	+2.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.70%	5.34%	+3.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.45%	6.91%	+3.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.63%	6.21%	+4.42%

MBAPX vs. MCONX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBAPX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than MCONX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

MBAPX vs. MCONX - Dividend Comparison

MBAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, less than MCONX's 4.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MBAPX Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio	4.64%	4.93%	4.30%	2.23%	2.82%	2.12%	4.82%	3.80%	5.32%	3.76%	2.99%	3.38%
MCONX Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio	4.74%	4.76%	4.90%	1.85%	2.31%	1.66%	3.49%	2.61%	3.84%	3.06%	2.25%	2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MBAPX and MCONX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, MBAPX and MCONX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MBAPX or MCONX?

MBAPX has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to MCONX (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBAPX dropped -24.54% vs MCONX's -21.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MBAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.