MAZE vs. CCJ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

MAZE (Maze Therapeutics, Inc) and CCJ (Cameco Corporation) are both stocks. MAZE operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while CCJ operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past year, MAZE returned 77.49% vs 52.94% for CCJ. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MAZE vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Maze Therapeutics, Inc (MAZE) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAZE achieves a -41.95% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's 10.35% return.

MAZE

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -10.79%
• YTD: -41.95%
• 6M: -38.11%
• 1Y: 77.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCJ

• 1D: 2.01%
• 1M: -12.51%
• YTD: 10.35%
• 6M: 10.35%
• 1Y: 52.94%
• 3Y*: 47.60%
• 5Y*: 36.72%
• 10Y*: 25.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAZE vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MAZE Maze Therapeutics, Inc	-41.95%	157.01%
CCJ Cameco Corporation	10.35%	82.24%

Correlation

The correlation between MAZE and CCJ is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025	0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap MAZE : $1.30B CCJ : $43.98B
EPS MAZE : -$2.63 CCJ : CA$1.49
PB Ratio MAZE : 3.79 CCJ : 8.68
Total Revenue (TTM) MAZE : $0.00 CCJ : CA$3.54B
Gross Profit (TTM) MAZE : -$1.15M CCJ : CA$1.04B
EBITDA (TTM) MAZE : -$126.66M CCJ : CA$996.66M

Return for Risk

MAZE vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAZE

MAZE Risk / Return Rank: 72
MAZE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
MAZE Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
MAZE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
MAZE Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
MAZE Martin Ratio Rank: 69

CCJ

CCJ Risk / Return Rank: 72
CCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
CCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAZE vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Maze Therapeutics, Inc (MAZE) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAZE	CCJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	0.96	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	1.68	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.20	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	1.83	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.16	4.43	-1.26

MAZE vs. CCJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAZE Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAZE and CCJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAZE vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAZE drawdown since its inception was -54.51%, smaller than the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAZE and CCJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAZE	CCJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.51%	-87.53%	+33.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.51%	-29.13%	-25.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-40.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.01%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.60%	-24.71%	-28.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.99%	-46.07%	+25.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.60%	11.99%	+12.61%

Volatility

MAZE vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Maze Therapeutics, Inc (MAZE) is 11.72%, while Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a volatility of 17.90%. This indicates that MAZE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAZE	CCJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.72%	17.90%	-6.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.26%	39.91%	+16.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	89.54%	55.17%	+34.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	94.20%	50.01%	+44.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	94.20%	46.75%	+47.45%

Dividends

MAZE vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison

MAZE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCJ Cameco Corporation	0.17%	0.19%	0.22%	0.20%	0.39%	0.29%	0.46%	0.67%	0.53%	4.33%	3.82%	3.24%
MAZE Maze Therapeutics, Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAZE and CCJ in my portfolio?

MAZE and CCJ have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAZE or CCJ?

CCJ has higher volatility (17.90%) compared to MAZE (11.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAZE dropped -54.51% vs CCJ's -87.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.