MATE vs. TYLD
MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) and TYLD (Cambria Tactical Yield ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MATE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TYLD.
Performance
MATE vs. TYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MATE achieves a 19.52% return, which is significantly higher than TYLD's 1.96% return.
MATE
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 14.57%
- YTD
- 19.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TYLD
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 3.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $76.58K | $194.59K | $173.90K | |
| $17.33K | $121.77K | $74.62K |
MATE vs. TYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 19.52% | 2.65% |
TYLD Cambria Tactical Yield ETF | 1.96% | 0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between MATE and TYLD is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MATE vs. TYLD — Risk / Return Rank
MATE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TYLD
MATE vs. TYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MATE | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.52 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 21.20 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 112.10 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MATE vs. TYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MATE drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, which is greater than TYLD's maximum drawdown of -1.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATE and TYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MATE | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -1.06% | -12.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -0.02% | -1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -0.10% | -3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.03% | — |
Volatility
MATE vs. TYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MATE | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.34% | 0.73% | +21.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 1.72% | +20.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 1.72% | +20.62% |
MATE vs. TYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MATE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than TYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
MATE vs. TYLD - Dividend Comparison
MATE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TYLD Cambria Tactical Yield ETF | 3.72% | 4.38% | 4.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MATE and TYLD have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.
TYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 0.00% for MATE.
They also come from different issuers: Man Group and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MATE and 0.59% for TYLD.
Find the right allocation for MATE and TYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer