MATE vs. RSST

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) and RSST (Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MATE is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Man Group, while RSST is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MATE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for RSST.

Performance

MATE vs. RSST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MATE achieves a 17.63% return, which is significantly higher than RSST's 16.23% return.

MATE

• 1D: 2.30%
• 1M: -1.01%
• YTD: 17.63%
• 6M: 18.70%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSST

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -2.08%
• YTD: 16.23%
• 6M: 15.13%
• 1Y: 51.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MATE vs. RSST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF	17.63%	2.65%
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF	16.23%	3.01%

Correlation

The correlation between MATE and RSST is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025	0.92

Return for Risk

MATE vs. RSST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MATE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RSST

RSST Risk / Return Rank: 71
RSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
RSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
RSST Omega Ratio Rank: 65
RSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
RSST Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MATE vs. RSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MATE	RSST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.23	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.63	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.46	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.56	—

Drawdowns

MATE vs. RSST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MATE drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, smaller than the maximum RSST drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATE and RSST.

Drawdown Indicators

	MATE	RSST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.24%	-30.80%	+17.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.68%	-5.21%	+2.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.33%	-6.02%	+2.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.58%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MATE	RSST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.06%	23.50%	-0.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.06%	24.47%	-1.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.06%	24.47%	-1.41%

MATE vs. RSST - Expense Ratio Comparison

MATE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than RSST's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

MATE vs. RSST - Dividend Comparison

MATE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF	0.97%	1.12%	0.09%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MATE and RSST in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, MATE and RSST move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, MATE or RSST?

On fees, MATE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MATE or RSST?

MATE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RSST.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MATE or RSST?

RSST has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for MATE.

What is the main difference between MATE and RSST?

MATE is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while RSST is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Man Group and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MATE and 0.99% for RSST.