MATE vs. RHRX
MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) and RHRX (RH Tactical Rotation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MATE charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for RHRX.
Performance
MATE vs. RHRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MATE achieves a 12.55% return, which is significantly lower than RHRX's 18.64% return.
MATE
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- 12.55%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RHRX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 18.64%
- 6M
- 17.22%
- 1Y
- 33.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MATE vs. RHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 12.55% | 2.65% |
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF | 18.64% | 0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MATE and RHRX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MATE vs. RHRX — Risk / Return Rank
MATE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RHRX
MATE vs. RHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MATE | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MATE vs. RHRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MATE drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, smaller than the maximum RHRX drawdown of -25.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATE and RHRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MATE | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -25.33% | +12.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.87% | -2.83% | -4.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -8.86% | +5.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.83% | — |
Volatility
MATE vs. RHRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MATE | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.26% | 14.19% | +9.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.26% | 19.11% | +4.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.26% | 19.11% | +4.15% |
MATE vs. RHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MATE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than RHRX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
MATE vs. RHRX - Dividend Comparison
Neither MATE nor RHRX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MATE and RHRX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MATE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MATE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.36% for RHRX.
MATE and RHRX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Man Group and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MATE and 1.36% for RHRX.
Find the right allocation for MATE and RHRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer