MATE vs. MANI
MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) and MANI (Man Active Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MATE is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Man Group, while MANI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Man Group. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MATE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MANI.
Performance
MATE vs. MANI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MATE achieves a 12.55% return, which is significantly higher than MANI's 2.59% return.
MATE
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- 12.55%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MANI
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 2.59%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MATE vs. MANI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 12.55% | 2.65% |
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 2.59% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between MATE and MANI is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MATE vs. MANI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and Man Active Income ETF (MANI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MATE vs. MANI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MATE drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, which is greater than MANI's maximum drawdown of -1.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATE and MANI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MATE | MANI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -1.54% | -11.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.87% | -1.54% | -5.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -0.11% | -3.26% |
Volatility
MATE vs. MANI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MATE | MANI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.26% | 2.71% | +20.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.26% | 2.71% | +20.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.26% | 2.71% | +20.55% |
MATE vs. MANI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MATE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than MANI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
MATE vs. MANI - Dividend Comparison
MATE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MANI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 3.22% | 3.00% |
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MATE and MANI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MANI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MANI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.
MANI has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.00% for MATE.
MATE is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while MANI is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MATE and 0.85% for MANI.
Find the right allocation for MATE and MANI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer