PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MATE vs. JPFP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MATE vs. JPFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MATE

1D
-1.46%
1M
-5.28%
YTD
12.55%
6M
10.14%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JPFP

1D
-1.38%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MATE vs. JPFP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MATE and JPFP is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MATE vs. JPFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MATE vs. JPFP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MATE vs. JPFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MATE drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, which is greater than JPFP's maximum drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATE and JPFP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MATEJPFPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.24%

-5.85%

-7.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.87%

-5.85%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-2.52%

-0.85%

Volatility

MATE vs. JPFP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MATEJPFPDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.26%

22.30%

+0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.26%

22.30%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.26%

22.30%

+0.96%

MATE vs. JPFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MATE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than JPFP's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

MATE vs. JPFP - Dividend Comparison

Neither MATE nor JPFP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, MATE and JPFP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, JPFP is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPFP is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.

MATE and JPFP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

MATE is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while JPFP is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Man Group and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MATE and 0.59% for JPFP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MATE and JPFP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer