MARU vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MARU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MARU is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) Price Return, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MARU returned 16.47% vs 27.76% for ENFR. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MARU charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

MARU vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARU achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.93% return.

MARU

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: 5.63%
• 6M: 4.75%
• 1Y: 16.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ENFR

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -4.52%
• YTD: 24.93%
• 6M: 25.03%
• 1Y: 27.76%
• 3Y*: 28.90%
• 5Y*: 20.07%
• 10Y*: 11.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARU vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MARU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF	5.63%	10.80%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	24.93%	0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MARU and ENFR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2025	0.10

The correlation between MARU and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MARU vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARU

MARU Risk / Return Rank: 53
MARU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
MARU Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
MARU Omega Ratio Rank: 49
MARU Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
MARU Martin Ratio Rank: 58

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 57
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARU vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MARU	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.88	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	2.59	-0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.32	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	3.23	-0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.32	8.24	+1.08

MARU vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARU Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARU and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MARU vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARU drawdown since its inception was -9.91%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARU and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MARU	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.91%	-68.28%	+58.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.56%	-8.64%	+2.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.59%	-4.71%	+2.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.60%	-15.94%	+14.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.77%	3.38%	-1.61%

Volatility

MARU vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU) is 3.76%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that MARU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MARU	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.76%	5.69%	-1.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.96%	11.60%	-3.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.32%	14.86%	-4.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.02%	19.25%	-7.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.02%	24.68%	-12.66%

MARU vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

MARU vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

MARU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.02%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%
MARU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MARU and ENFR in my portfolio?

MARU and ENFR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MARU or ENFR?

ENFR has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to MARU (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARU dropped -9.91% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

Which ETF is better, MARU or ENFR?

On 1-year performance, ENFR leads with 27.76% vs 16.47% for MARU. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, MARU has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MARU or ENFR?

Over the 1-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 27.76% return vs 16.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MARU or ENFR?

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for MARU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MARU or ENFR?

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.00% for MARU.

What is the main difference between MARU and ENFR?

MARU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ENFR is Energy Equities. MARU tracks SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) Price Return, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: AllianzIM and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MARU and 0.35% for ENFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.