MARU vs. JANU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MARU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF) and JANU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from AllianzIM. MARU is passively managed, while JANU is actively managed. Over the past year, MARU returned 19.61% vs 20.21% for JANU. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

MARU vs. JANU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF (JANU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MARU having a 7.88% return and JANU slightly higher at 8.05%.

MARU

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 4.24%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 7.09%
• 1Y: 19.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JANU

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 4.14%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 6M: 7.44%
• 1Y: 20.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARU vs. JANU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MARU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF	7.88%	12.53%
JANU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF	8.05%	12.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MARU and JANU is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025	0.99

The correlation between MARU and JANU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MARU vs. JANU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARU

MARU Risk / Return Rank: 61
MARU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
MARU Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
MARU Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MARU Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
MARU Martin Ratio Rank: 64

JANU

JANU Risk / Return Rank: 67
JANU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
JANU Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
JANU Omega Ratio Rank: 65
JANU Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
JANU Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARU vs. JANU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF (JANU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MARU	JANU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	2.13	-0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	2.98	-0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.38	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	3.39	-0.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.51	13.27	-1.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MARU vs. JANU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARU Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the JANU Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARU and JANU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MARU	JANU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01	2.13	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.43	1.31	+0.11

Drawdowns

MARU vs. JANU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARU drawdown since its inception was -8.50%, smaller than the maximum JANU drawdown of -11.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARU and JANU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MARU	JANU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.50%	-11.84%	+3.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.56%	-5.98%	-0.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-0.51%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.34%	-1.87%	+0.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	1.53%	+0.18%

Volatility

MARU vs. JANU - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF (JANU) have volatilities of 2.44% and 2.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MARU	JANU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.44%	2.53%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.47%	6.83%	+0.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.81%	9.55%	+0.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.78%	11.43%	+0.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.78%	11.43%	+0.35%

MARU vs. JANU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MARU and JANU have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

MARU vs. JANU - Dividend Comparison

Neither MARU nor JANU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MARU and JANU in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, MARU and JANU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MARU or JANU?

JANU has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to MARU (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARU dropped -8.50% vs JANU's -11.84%.

Which ETF is better, MARU or JANU?

On 1-year performance, JANU leads with 20.21% vs 19.61% for MARU. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MARU or JANU?

Over the 1-year period, JANU has performed better with a 20.21% return vs 19.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MARU or JANU?

MARU and JANU have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MARU or JANU?

MARU and JANU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JANU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.