MARU vs. DECU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MARU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF) and DECU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from AllianzIM. MARU is passively managed, while DECU is actively managed. Over the past year, MARU returned 16.47% vs 15.48% for DECU. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

MARU vs. DECU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARU achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly higher than DECU's 5.22% return.

MARU

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: 5.63%
• 6M: 4.75%
• 1Y: 16.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DECU

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -1.39%
• YTD: 5.22%
• 6M: 4.88%
• 1Y: 15.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARU vs. DECU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MARU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF	5.63%	10.80%
DECU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF	5.22%	10.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MARU and DECU is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2025	0.97

The correlation between MARU and DECU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MARU vs. DECU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARU

MARU Risk / Return Rank: 53
MARU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
MARU Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
MARU Omega Ratio Rank: 49
MARU Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
MARU Martin Ratio Rank: 58

DECU

DECU Risk / Return Rank: 55
DECU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
DECU Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
DECU Omega Ratio Rank: 51
DECU Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
DECU Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARU vs. DECU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MARU	DECU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.64	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	2.26	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.29	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	2.75	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.32	9.74	-0.42

MARU vs. DECU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARU Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the DECU Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARU and DECU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MARU vs. DECU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARU drawdown since its inception was -9.91%, smaller than the maximum DECU drawdown of -10.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARU and DECU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MARU	DECU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.91%	-10.66%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.56%	-5.65%	-0.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.59%	-2.80%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.60%	-1.73%	+0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.77%	1.59%	+0.18%

Volatility

MARU vs. DECU - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) have volatilities of 3.76% and 3.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MARU	DECU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.76%	3.86%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.96%	7.00%	+0.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.32%	9.47%	+0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.02%	10.79%	+1.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.02%	10.79%	+1.23%

MARU vs. DECU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MARU and DECU have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

MARU vs. DECU - Dividend Comparison

Neither MARU nor DECU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MARU and DECU in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, MARU and DECU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MARU or DECU?

DECU has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to MARU (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARU dropped -9.91% vs DECU's -10.66%.

Which ETF is better, MARU or DECU?

On 1-year performance, MARU leads with 16.47% vs 15.48% for DECU. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, MARU has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MARU or DECU?

Over the 1-year period, MARU has performed better with a 16.47% return vs 15.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MARU or DECU?

MARU and DECU have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MARU or DECU?

MARU and DECU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DECU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.